Of course the problem with leading a movement is that the leader is inevitably targeted by the establishment, and it has never been easier in human history to do so than now. See: basically the central mission of the FBI post WWII.
While true, it’s still a fact that the leaderless movements don’t usually get anything done and movements with leaders do. Sure the leader will likely have to face being targeted but it still makes it more likely to be able to achieve the movement’s goals.
Where I work they did something like this with our employee resource groups. When a minority had something to bring up the erg leader would get targeted and fired for various reasons. A new person from the erg with fight in them would step in and inevitably get axed down the line too. This went on for about a year and now we don’t have much voice left
Of course the problem with leading a movement is that the leader is inevitably targeted by the establishment, and it has never been easier in human history to do so than now. See: basically the central mission of the FBI post WWII.
While true, it’s still a fact that the leaderless movements don’t usually get anything done and movements with leaders do. Sure the leader will likely have to face being targeted but it still makes it more likely to be able to achieve the movement’s goals.
Where I work they did something like this with our employee resource groups. When a minority had something to bring up the erg leader would get targeted and fired for various reasons. A new person from the erg with fight in them would step in and inevitably get axed down the line too. This went on for about a year and now we don’t have much voice left