• firadin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    21 minutes ago

    Keep seeing this picture but no control group. Give me the same data for a French city other than Paris to understand whether this is about local policy change or about emissions standards and the move to electric cars.

  • someguy3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 minutes ago

    How much of this was dieselgate and DEF fluid? Googling say DEF was implemented in 2015 in Europe.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Woah, woah, keep it down lads. There’s Americans around who can’t handle this kind of information!

    • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 minutes ago

      I’m an American who wants European style cities and public transport because it’s actually better for drivers, too.

      Germany has zero speed limit on some highways because of this.

    • firadin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      21 minutes ago

      Also no control group to determine whether this was due to bike lanes like the post title claims

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      59 minutes ago

      Legend? This is an image of Paris transforming from an active volcano into a radioactive site.

    • huppakee@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I posted this somewhere in the comments already, but copy pasting it to be helpful:.

      Op cut it out for some reason, but it is in the linked article. Here is a screenshot of the ‘y-axis’:

  • fenrasulfr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Although it is good that they added riding bicycle lanes I doubt that is the only reason for the lowering of pollution.

    Not only do we have electric and hybrid cars, due to euro standard combustion engines have become a lot cleaner during the same span of time. Plus public transport has also become a lot better during that time.

    • nuko147@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Yeah, car restriction is the key. Then you must plan for people who needs to move. Cars don’t belong to the city, only for leisure trips outside.

    • 0x0@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Yeah but then you can’t feed the bycicle narrative because of course everybody starting their bikes to.commute those distances!

      • fenrasulfr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Well it does have a major impact, less cars -> less congestion -> less polution. But it has to work in tandem with other changes such as lowering driving speed increasing public transport network with emphasis on network, mandating tighter control on polution. You could say that the bicycle lanes are an indication of a change in attitude towards car only transportation.

        • huppakee@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          could have seen that, think i didn’t because it the graph is about cars and pollution. I get op’s anti-us sentiment, but funny thing is that a lot of data in newspapers with graphs in km is still (at least partially) based on data and research from us but well

  • slaacaa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Just one more lane bro. I promise bro just one more lane and it’ll fix everything bro. Bro, just one more lane. Please just one more, one more lane and we can fix this whole problem bro, bro c’mon just give me one more lane i promise bro, bro bro please! Just need one more lane

  • azimir@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    148
    ·
    24 hours ago

    “It turns out not burning a bunch of fossil fuels leads to less pollution”… news at 11.

    The really dumb part of all of this is that people have just accepted cars as the default mode of transportation for so long that it’s hard to even envision a world without them. They’re normal, despite being expensive, dangerous, horribly inefficient, killing people actively (crashes) and passively (air pollution, plastic in our lungs, parkinsons/dementia, obesity, and more), and directly contributing to isolation in our communities. Every car we can get off the road, especially in our cities, makes the world a better place.

    • grue@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      people have just accepted cars as the default mode of transportation

      That wasn’t an accident and it didn’t just ‘happen;’ it was the very deliberate result of a combination of automobile and oil industry propaganda and US government policy back in the 1930s-1950s, motivated by several factors ranging from utopian modernist city planning to good ol’fashioned racism.

      Some random sources to get folks started:

      • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        13 hours ago

        there’s also the argument that pushing to distribute population centers away from cities forced the soviet union to manufacture larger and more numerous atomic weapons to maintain parity with US capabilities.

        not in the “hey we want to save as many people” way it’s portrayed, more like, let’s make it harder for the sov’s to equal the potential megadeaths we intended to dish out

    • Bibbiliop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Its an interesting angle because that is what we did exactly with smartphones and social media too. We adopted them so voluntarily as if they were the best things happened in this century.

      But looks like in todays world we could have been a much better society without them ever existing

      • Katana314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        54 minutes ago

        For all the doomscrolling we do on smartphones, I’m still of the mindset that there are many ways their existence has made people’s lives better. For instance, I likely never would have become so transit-brained if not for smartphones. I practically have nightmares of trying to navigate train maps/schedules through nothing but paper and a loose idea of where my destination was.

      • azimir@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I’ll definitely have to check out the underpinnings and use of that term. Thank you for bringing it to my attention.

    • Kualdir@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      24 hours ago

      After I’ve moved I could technically do everything using public transport and bikes

      The issue is that public transport is literally more expensive than a private car for me in the Netherlands (as I get a company car)

      • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Perhaps ask the company to reimburse you for the transit costs rather than providing the car? I’m sure they would love to save the money, and let you continue to save the money the car was saving you.

        • Inktvip@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Even with a privately owned car, driving somewhere is often still cheaper than public transport here. Including when factoring in maintenance. The only thing that might offset it when driving alone is parking costs.

          Every time my wife and me want to visit a city I look at train tickets as it would be convenient to just get off the station in the city centre, only for me to realise that I’m way better off just driving there, and then use buses/metro to get around the city itself.

          • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            It’s probably not cheaper if you consider the externalized costs. Sure, you don’t personally pay up front for all the pollution, traffic, and poor use of space, but everyone does.

        • Kualdir@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          23 hours ago

          I have an OV pass to use public transport for work but I get to use my car privately for free (outside of extra taxes) and not the OV pass

            • Kualdir@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              12 hours ago

              I was planning on checking after I moved but nit high hopes, org is pretty rigid

            • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              15 hours ago

              Yeah, “you get to keep the car, I get unlimited travel pass, deal?” People often seem to think policies are iron clad, but they’re just decisions.

              Might be hard because the car is a significant upfront investment. The sunk cost is another big reason people defend their cars.

              • Kualdir@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                12 hours ago

                I’ve got a flex lease which I can end at any time so sunk cost should not be an issue here 😄

    • WarlordSdocy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      23 hours ago

      The crazy thing as well is that especially after COVID people will use the isolation of cars as a positive. You have people who don’t like transit cause they would have to be near other people. Which just shows how crazy isolated and disconnected from our communities we are in the US atleast.

  • Photuris@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    23 hours ago

    France isn’t perfect or without its own problems (or fucking right-wingers), but damn overall they’re really crushing it lately.

    (I wonder how hard it is to emigrate to France…)

    • freebee@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      That’s happening in Paris. Some other cities are moving in right direction too, some installing new trams from zero etc. Most bigger cities have subways. But you should try visiting rural France without a car… Not a butcher or a bakery left for many kilometers/villages around, only big roadside Malls with an enormous supermarket and some fake little “shops” at the entrance. Many rural villages are dead and without a car you’re screwed big time. This is where the Gilet Jaunes came from.

    • teolan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Our president just said democracy? Never heard of her and named prime minister a member of the party with the least elected parliementaries but OK.

  • Changer098@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    22 hours ago

    This graph is HIGHLY misleading as it doesn’t include the time in 2019 when Notre Dame’s pollution was much higher for a brief period of time.