weird@sub.wetshaving.social to memes@lemmy.world · 2 months agoBig naturals is way easier to pronouncesub.wetshaving.socialimagemessage-square69linkfedilinkarrow-up11.18Karrow-down10
arrow-up11.18Karrow-down1imageBig naturals is way easier to pronouncesub.wetshaving.socialweird@sub.wetshaving.social to memes@lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square69linkfedilink
minus-squareSchwertImStein@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·2 months agoyou answered your own question
minus-squareewenak@jlai.lulinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 months agoWell what I learned in school was that zero was both positive and negative. I knew some people consider the natural numbers don’t include zero, but I didn’t know for some zero isn’t even positive.
minus-squareSchwertImStein@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-22 months agoit is neither positive nor negative
minus-squaredeltapi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-22 months agoI knew a physicist who considered 0 negative if she arrived at 0 coming from negative source numbers and positive if coming from positive sources. Something something sampling rate
minus-squareMBM@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 months agoSome places (like France) talk about positive and strictly positive, others (like England) about non-negative and positive
you answered your own question
Well what I learned in school was that zero was both positive and negative. I knew some people consider the natural numbers don’t include zero, but I didn’t know for some zero isn’t even positive.
it is neither positive nor negative
I knew a physicist who considered 0 negative if she arrived at 0 coming from negative source numbers and positive if coming from positive sources.
Something something sampling rate
Some places (like France) talk about positive and strictly positive, others (like England) about non-negative and positive