Those are all secondary things added on top of pure democracy.
Pure democracy is a question of definition. Greek democracy? Pre 1960-ish US democracy? Only men can vote? The adult population has the right to vote but no right to free assembly and speech?
Those are all secondary things added on top of pure democracy. None of those protections are intrinsic to democracy in general.
I wouldn’t support a direct / minimalist democracy without guarantee of civil liberties even if I was part of the majority.
Too close to mob rule for me.
That seems like exactly what OP is asking
Depends on your definition of democracy
In context of the question, we’re talking simple, basic, direct democracy. Whatever 50%+1 of the population wants, goes.
Pure democracy is a question of definition. Greek democracy? Pre 1960-ish US democracy? Only men can vote? The adult population has the right to vote but no right to free assembly and speech?