Hey there, I’ve been trying to reach you about your chip’s extended warranty!

Eh, if they fund research in other countries they also have to abide by this if they want continued funding.

I think I get what you’re saying, and I completely agree with the first parts. What I don’t quite understand is how the conciousness would differentiate between the two clones in all scenarios.

If we create a copy and pause at the exact moment of creation, where both copies are exactly the same, how would the conciousness “choose bodies”?

If we kill the person first, doesn’t that necessitate that the clone has been killed as well in that case?

But if you say that a perfect copy of you is literally you, why would it matter if the “original” is destroyed or not? The result should still be the same (as in a copy that is a separate conciousness) no?

Funny you say that. Stuff Made Here released a Youtube video yesterday where he tried to do the opposite, a brownie tray that only makes the soft center!

Edit: Damnit, didn’t realise this was already linked…

In five and a half weeks™

He postponed it five and a half weeks. The new date is 9th of July.

Reminds me of this story where they couldn’t send e-mails farther than 500 miles.

Trust me, I’m an expert!

Iirc basically all the board members and higher ups that get stock sell it off as soon as they get it. None of them have bought more for quite a while. So unfortunately it seems like they’ll float on.

Ahh, Elaida is such a great character! Really looking forward to what they are going to do with her in the show

Have/will they face any repercussions for this though?

That sank into a crater. So we built a third one. That burned down, fell over, and then sank into a crater. But the fourth one stayed up. And that’s what you’re going to get, Lad, the strongest spacecraft on all of the Moon.

I don’t want to be that guy, but that sounds neither healthy nor very economical.

Yeah, I definitely misread the article, my bad! I doubt the EU will let it stand when it’s enacted.

It isn’t law yet though, and it is the current iteration that Google won’t follow. We have yet to see how they will react if it actually becomes law. My guess is that they will, begrudgingly, bend the knee.

I suppose search engines should ask you which maps provider you want and then show results based on that.

Google could have done that, but they chose to go this router to inconvenience users, so that they then could blame the EU for this.

To be fair, the same argument can be applied both ways.

Depends, he might not be a giver!

Ligma balls!