- 3 Posts
- 8 Comments
Ban it.
It’s basically a misinformation machine even if it doesn’t have an agenda.
Disclaimer is pointless.
DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.deto Fediverse@lemmy.world•Lemmy.world removes its rules against discriminationEnglish0·2 years agoWas there any discussion about this change? Or is this it.
You’re all missing the real kicker here - this sign is only here for the HIPAA auditor. Everyone knows that no one is actually going to mute the thing.
DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.deOPto Australia@aussie.zone•Referendum Results, Congratulations, ComiserationsEnglish0·2 years agoYeah - the voice didn’t really mean much to my day to day at all, but this loss is indicative of our deepening conservative bent.
DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.deto Reddit@lemmy.world•The final nail in Reddit's coffin dropped today:English1·2 years agoYeah no one who’s still there cares at all.
DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.deto No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•Data privacy: how to counter the "I have nothing to hide" argument?English0·2 years agoI feel like most replies here are missing the point.
The entire premise of the statement is that privacy is about defending your dirty secrets. When people say “nothing to hide” they’re really saying “I’m not going to post about anything I want to hide”, but that still misses the point.
For me it’s the subtle principles of advertising. I don’t want to be advertised to, at all. I certainly don’t want some blog to know what adverts I’m likely to engage with, because that is simply none of their business.
That’s it. If that doesn’t bother some people, that’s entirely fine. I’m a bit weird, and the whole idea of being tracked to figure out what things I might want to buy makes me very grumpy.
If there was a bot that just flooded All with far right talking points, do you think admins ought to block that or leave it to the users?
What if it was far right mixed in with cat memes?
What if it started more slowly like a few posts an hour and then ramped up over 6 months to be 1000s of posts per hour?