I said 3 words. Not a single one was about driving. I don’t care about driving, and I couldn’t care less how people drive in bum fuck amerikkka or wherever else. Those 3 words were about you and all you did was prove me right. Cheerio, you sad bastard.

least toxic driver

Ah, never mind, just saw the website. They look like they are glazed like normaly made ones, so any holes will get pluged by the glaze.

Would those be food-safe? I know normal 3d prints are porous, and that leads to bacterial/mold growth.

The ‘cookie’ law is (mainly) the ePrivacy Directive, that requires websites to get a user’s informed, specific, and affirmative consent before storing or accessing non-essential information on their device.

To comply a website must inform users about their cookie usage (who is using it, why, and how long they are stored, I think) and allow users to easily withdraw their consent at any time (though there’s no requirement to easily decline).

Actualy looking at the site, it already might be? I’m not sure, I don’t remember the specifics of the law. But there is a banner pop up and you do inform cookies are used and why, and there’s an easy way to withdraw consent.

You’re the one who brought age into this convo?

I will not ›:(

Cool? Not what is being asked tho

This is starwarsmemes, most people here are nerds lmao

But there was still a ship, the one you build to end the game

Scratch that, there’s three. Australia is just an island with overgrown ego.

So, there’s 4 continents? Abya Yala, Afrasia, Australia and Antarctica

Yes? The new path is there because it’s still shorter, people don’t walk in straight lines and sharp angles. That design is still lazy and not thought out

Oh. What is the point then? /gen

It didn’t work out because the design didn’t change, it was reinforced. Each attempt failed because there was no actual effort to understand why it’s not working. Like wraping a leaky rusted pipe in ducktape.

To everybody acting like the desire path is the problem:

1. If the problem for you is that it’s ‘bad’ or ‘illegal’, grow a spine so that when you need to break the law, for something that matters, you can do it with dry pants.
2. If the design doesn’t take into account how people will interact with it, it’s bad and lazy. Only time it would be acceptable to ‘force’ a way to interact with something is when there are safety concerns, and there are none here.
3. You are traped in a cage of your own making, break free or perish like the dog you are.

OH! Finally! A chance to use my knowledge acquired from scrolling wikipedia while procrastinating! That law hasn’t been overturned and is still, well, law. Of course every once in a while some clueless cop (because why should somebody enforcing the law, know the law sigh) will ask a topless sunbather to cover up. Here’s the article.

Sure, but the health impact of a modern laser printer is on par with other daily health hazards at worst. Modern toner shouldn’t contain anything dangerous, nanoparticles could be a problem depending on amount of printing and the printer model, but if you live in a city you will breathe in more by opening a window. Ozone is emmited during printing but in small enough amounts that it will be problematic only in a small room with shit ventilation and tons of printing, and I mean tons, atleast a couple of books worth.

I caught myself writing a long response to this, but I got something that I belive will be better: Ok, USAmerican.