Consider that there might not be a single unifying explaination and instead a number of compounding factors.

They would never, thats illegal!

Seems like the diagram on my soup taxonomy paper is not going to make it through peer review 😔

Only the highest quality shit science posts here

Idk why I like this, high quality healthy shit post.

Yeah, had one for over a year now and it’s still going strong. You can literally put it under the shower stream and it will be fine.

Rite in rain + pencil

And go on the Joe Organ podcast ofc

I have seen some others, but I checked the account and they haven’t posted for a year or so. Seems like they quit after they started using alternate characters.

I know it’s a little crazy to me. I know of at least one guy who quit the platform after he started experimenting with alternate characters as an armchair linguist, because of the hate they were getting. Can’t people have their fun or be different? Do you also go crazy if someone makes a spelling mistake or if you see a ßöøê character? In get the misinformation part for the other person, but I still think some of you are overreacting.

Ze vragen tijdens het openen van een rekening ook of je iets in de politiek doet. Dat maakte me behoorlijk oncomfortabel.

I don’t get it. Would someone care to explain?

Do you then think (considering that it is possible) that the development of a super intelligence is inevitable?

I am expecting disappointment, and maybe a few cool technologies that will stick around. Don’t think we are going to get AGI soon, but if we did, no-one asked for it anyways.

I don’t quite get your question, but It’s not bullshit, I believe that the terms were first coined by Marx (if memory serves). The base superstucture model is just a model by which to view the world, in that it explains (to some degree) how sociocultural/economic and other phenomenon arise from the means and relations of production, which is definitely true to some extent. But no model is perfect and it’s not the only model. The world is pretty complex and people can and do take actions that defy this model.

Source, I tagged along with an anthropology course where this was covered. So I definitely don’t know everything there is to know.

Thanks for taking the time to respond, but that sounds genuinely aweful. I’ve had these treats for my cat as well, but I didn’t realize that they could be that addictive.

Can you elaborate?

Right and we also use lemmy, but we still weigh and judge what we read here or at least we should. And we should do the same for Wikipedia, even though I would argue that Wikipedia has higher epistemic standards than Lemmy. The point being, the openness of these platforms is a quality on its own. Wikipedia isn’t perfect, but it is far from terrible.

It’s true that it is not generally accepted for writing a paper or essay, but that does not mean that the information is completely unreliable. While I’m sure that Wikipedia is not perfect with regards to truth, it is more accessible, democratized and readable than many primary sources or peer reviewed articles. Those properties have a lot of value by themselves. Would you not agree?

Canal bridges that open to let ships through for some reason? I often see tourist making pictures of that.