- 8 Posts
- 18 Comments
HumanPerson@sh.itjust.worksOPto Cars - For Car Enthusiasts@lemmy.world•Tire recommendationsEnglish1·15 天前It looks like there may be a buy 3 get 1 on the nokian ones near me.
HumanPerson@sh.itjust.worksOPto Fuck Cars@lemmy.world•Car Enthusiasts Against Car Dependency [discussion]English4·25 天前A valid point. There are laws for headlight adjustment but they’re unenforced and out of date. We need regulations for LEDs and definitely laser headlights that exist for some reason.
HumanPerson@sh.itjust.worksOPto Fuck Cars@lemmy.world•Car Enthusiasts Against Car Dependency [discussion]English5·25 天前There are many reasons to hate cars, but I am curious how you would replace them entirely. Even in the Netherlands there are cars, there are just viable alternatives for most people. I would seriously be interested in how a system with zero cars would work. We certainly don’t need the amount there are now, but I think there are a few jobs for which they are the right tool.
Reminds me of this video.
HumanPerson@sh.itjust.worksto Videos@lemmy.world•Things you say whilst parking the car that you can also say in the bedroomEnglish3·1 个月前Look at that asshole.
A bit of both for small decisions. I’d trust it with little things and for more important stuff it could work for the trick where you flip a coin and figure out which thing you actually wanted by gauging your reaction to the result.
Nvm the hyperlink had but and I didn’t see.
It’s down for me.
HumanPerson@sh.itjust.worksto Technology@lemmy.world•Everyone Is Cheating Their Way Through CollegeEnglish3·1 个月前Are you accusing me of excusing hypocrisy or crimes against humanity? (I’m guessing not the latter and also legitimately asking)
HumanPerson@sh.itjust.worksto Technology@lemmy.world•Everyone Is Cheating Their Way Through CollegeEnglish68·1 个月前I feel like one of the more important things to take away from this is the wildly different degrees to which various students use ai. Yes, 90% may use it, but there is a huge difference between “check following paper for grammar errors: …” and “write me a paper on the ethics of generative AI,” though an argument could be made that both are cheating. But there are things like “explain Taylor series to me in an intuitive way.” Like someone else here pointed out, a 1-2 minute conversation would be a very easy way for professors to find people who cheated. There seems to be a more common view (I see it a LOT on Lemmy) that all AI is completely evil and anything with a neural network is made by Satan. Nuance exists.
Eh, I sometimes spin up a temporary docker container for some nonsense on a separate computer. I usually just go for it after checking no one is on and backing up necessary data.
HumanPerson@sh.itjust.worksto Cars - For Car Enthusiasts@lemmy.world•[identified?] Help identify this carEnglish6·3 个月前My friend who is better at identifying cars than I says f type BMW, probably f10.
HumanPerson@sh.itjust.worksto Cars - For Car Enthusiasts@lemmy.world•[identified?] Help identify this carEnglish4·3 个月前Looks like at least 6
From what I’ve heard it’s someone who really doesn’t know what they’re doing making it, and it has a ton of obvious security issues that the dev refuses to acknowledge. It really isn’t something that people should actually use.
HumanPerson@sh.itjust.worksto Showerthoughts@lemmy.world•Alchemists misunderstood both chemistry and economicsEnglish8·5 个月前Not if you’re the only one who knows and can create artificial scarcity.
Gender affirming cars is such a great term because the people who drive them are exactly the people who will be most offended by it. Definitely stealing that.