Absolutely it is not universal, but that’s… kind of the problem.
Porn isn’t that big of an issue either way. Left-wing movements can take a stance on whatever side of it. The problem is when issues like this end up being targeted at some portions of the left-wing spectrum but not to others and you end up with a split down the middle that one or both sides decide to make into a dealbreaking issue.
Hey, if you just happen to be a run of the mill traditional prudish conservative that would actually be mildly heartening. I genuinely don’t care about those continuing to run that line.
Still not wrong about the underlying issue, though. And for the record, I don’t think anti-porn so-called “abolitionists” are “my enemy”. I think all left of center forces are my allies, personally. The problem is single issue wedges used as hostile propaganda do work, as seen very clearly in the case of trans issues.
I mean, ChatGPT broke the top 5 most visited sites earlier this year.
People do use chatbots, but there is a biiiig gap between popping in to a chatbot to… I don’t know, help you remember the name of a movie, or sub in for Google Translate or check your spelling or whatever people are doing in there, and a very different one to push it as an agentic always-there ur-feature.
Chatbots are alright at chatbotting, but most of these other applications are way out of spec and just don’t work or fit the user experience of the software they’re being bolted on to.
I sometimes think the overzealous, always-online blanket rejection of GenAI stuff is doing a disservice by obscuring the things that have an use from all this forced garbage designed to tick a checkbox.
FWIW, I’ll happily keep ignoring these features as long as I’m able to actually ignore them. It’s a bit of a waste, but not a dealbreaker. The whole conversation, the irrational stances, the insane, transparent false hype and the quivering economy-ending bubble are all exhausting and incredibly depressing.
I, once again, did not say or imply that I am persecuted in any way.
I do think porn is free expression, of sexuality and otherwise, and should be protected about as much as any other form of free expression. Which is not universally and without limit, before you try that one.
And all of that is not the same as saying I “can’t stand criticism” about it. Which I didn’t say or think. I will actively, aggressively criticise actual porn, both as a media product and as an industry.
Once again, the strawmanning and talking points aren’t doing much to disprove the notion that anti-porn activism will become the new TERF-like trojan horse wedge among ostensible leftist movements going forward. People don’t like to talk about those, but they are bad and this is incoming.
That’s a cool argument you’re having with a thing nobody said.
Educating children about sex in general is educating children about sex (and nobody here has argued against it or equated it with being anti-porn).
There is a rising trend in European lefitsm, and particularly in European feminism, that argues that all porn is inherently pernicious and ultimately should not exist.
Note those are two separate statements.
You definitely dabbled in the second of those statements when you claimed that “that [can’t] be considered safe for anyone”. Whether you meant to say what you said is in your head, but as presented that slope is both mighty slippery AND very consistent with some of the very anti sex-work trend I’m talking about. The false equivalence and misquote at the top of your response doesn’t lead me to believe you’re treating this “objectively”, either.
Waaay better than the porn bans and online age verification schemes, honestly.
I question why this is just for “children who show mysoginistic behavior”, though. Sex ed should be universal, and this should be a major part of sex ed.
I assume the fear here is parents complaining about their kids being talked about porn, which may end up being a larger underlying issue than the porn itself. I guess you just have to trust that education professionals handle the opportunity well and this doesn’t become a stern talking to for problem kids, which is likely to do as much as stern talking tos have done historically.
“Young humans” sure. Not young humans, you absolutely do you.
There’s a bit of an emerging trend in leftist European circles in particular that sees porn as inherently patriarchal and wrong and we’re not ready for how much anti-porn is going to be the new terfism yet. This is going to suck a lot, and not in a good way.
There are boys in trousers in the picture, though. And no real “short” skirts.
I mean… you do you, but some of this may be an eye of the beholder situation.
Good to know. In fairness, I don’t think you can get that much Coke in anything but plastic. They don’t do 1L cans and there are thick plastic bottles starting at 500ml, so thin plastic may actually be better.
I do think there’s a 1L glass bottle, but it’s more of a special edition thing. I don’t think it’s easy to find in supermarkets and I havent’ seen it anywhere else. And for any soft drink other than specifically Coca Cola it’s mostly just plastic for anything above 500 mil.
Is there anybody on Lemmy that isn’t a software engineer of some description? No? Anyone?
I can do 1L over a period of time… in a plastic bottle. If US cups are like they are elsewhere they eventually get eaten away by the liquid and start dripping, which seems to go against the implied notion that you can just order a big one and take it with you to keep drinking elsewhere.
Isn’t that the idea?
I used to live in a place where they just don’t do ice in soda at all, and it’s like licking a can of dried out syrup. In the local Imax they didn’t even have ice at all as an option. They looked at me like I was insane when I asked, then calmly pointed out that the soda comes out of the machine chilled. I just had to learn to watch two hour movies while sucking on a tub of lukewarm, full-strength soda like a deviant.
I think they probably felt that having SteamOS perpetually be the holder for the “most popular” slot in the Linux category is not what the survey is for.
But then, they could have also finally provided a historical chart of OS usage, or a different category for SteamOS altogether.
Oh, hey, it is. Why the hell would it work that way? It seems to be manually excluded from the unfiltered list despite being by far the biggest usage.
So the data exists but it’s weirdly buried for no reason.
Still, thanks for the pointer. I genuinely didn’t know they had it set up that way.
I mean, you do you, but I don’t see any of the things that you want requiring active surveillance. That all seems very attainable by having decent search, filtering and categorization tools.
If anything, I find myself now seeking “hidden gems on Steam” despite Steam knowing everything about my gaming habits. And that’s on Steam, which does have a semi-decent crowdsourced tagging and categorization system. Their main page recommendations for e have consistently been either generically popular shovelware or insistent recommendations for games I do like but already own in other platforms that I can’t tell Steam to stop shoving down my throat.
Is it listed? Do you have a link to that? Checking the latest survey the Linux section shows
“Arch Linux” 64 bit 0.32% +0.01%
Linux Mint 22.2 64 bit 0.24% +0.04%
Ubuntu Core 22 64 bit 0.14% 0.00%
Ubuntu 24.04.3 LTS 64 bit 0.12% +0.01%
I don’t see a SteamOS segment listed as a non-Linux OS anywhere, either. If they do provide the info I’d love to see it, but it doesn’t seem to be shown at a glance in the OS Version category.
Tracking game use by device isn’t any more or less “crazy” than anything else they store. It’s just telemetry. It’s noteworthy that they share it in the format that they share it.
Nnnnah, the hardware survey is a wildly different number. That’s what OS each account was using when they filled the survey.
This shows they have data on what OS each user is using at the time of running each game, on both a per-game and a per-hour basis and that they can tie all of it to each account across games and OSs. Which raises the question of why they run the hardware survey OS numbers in the first place, but I suppose if you’re sharing the survey results you share the survey results, even if you have more accurate data on the same stats elsewhere.
That’d be a very interesting, very different stat, though, because it means they know what percentage of Windows/Linux users go back and forth, and CAN separate Linux usage from Deck from other OSs, which they very pointedly do not do on the survey, where SteamOS doesn’t have its own entry. That’s unsurprising but notable, along with the fact that they don’t really report on their own hardware sales, either, despite being a main source of info about GPU and CPU vendors.
I’d say I’m more lenient about big data profiles than most people around here. I’d also say I understand why the reaction to the very real, very obvious overreach in the process of creating and using those profiles is radically opposed to any sort of personal recorded info.
The part that’s weird is the cute little exception we make around the December holidays to get weirdly invasive infographics to share on social media.
For the record, I’d dispute that I prefer personalized recs to general ads. I already know the things I like that I want to buy. I’d much rather get a poke on things “I’d never consider”.
I was on some social media site today and noted that there are some controversies going on where I only ever see the pushback and entirely infer that the people holding the opposite stance do exist, but they never show up in my channels. This is not unexpected in an algorithmically curated info landscape… but it’s kind of bad and dangerous.
Ditto for only ever being served media based on the media I already like. Again, obvious but important: that’s decidedly NOT how I got to like the media I already like.
I’ve said this elsewhere, but December is quickly becoming the time of the year when all the corpos tell us just exactly how much they spy on us and we all collectively go “Cool!” and tell each other about it for some reason.
FWIW, the median number of games played is four. Not forty, not fourteen, just four. If we’re going to get spyware stats, at least let’s put them in context. As it turns out, half of all Steam users are only playing the one game (given the numbers we know on concurrents, that’d be CS2/DOTA/PUBG or Apex, in most cases).
The play-everything, strong-opinion-haver user is a fraction of the userbase.
Also interesting, Steam is telling people how their playtime splits between Windows/Deck/Non-Deck Linux… but they pointedly don’t share those stats platform-wide. Sometimes silence is data, too.
It… kinda sounds like judgement.
So what happens to… you know, Uber drivers, software engineers for social media and Amazon drivers? Because there’s a biiig spectrum of work under capitalism, and it doesn’t fit particularly neatly in “selling your body” or “helping people”.
Look, nobody is saying that sex work can’t be exploitative or even that it’s not generally exploitative. The legal gray areas and general ickiness of the entire space is… a lot, and I think it needs specific regulation. But to take it as a uniquely patriarchal, capitalistic thing distinct from “normal” work requires not seeing it as proper labor, but as inherently… well, they do kind of abuse the word “abolition” very pointedly.
That has a long, nasty tradition with pretty unhealthy side effects, honestly.
In any case, that’s the rhetorical trick I’m worried about. You let the right own sex work AND you let the stance on this split feminist/leftist spaces in half and you’ve manufactured a mix of TERFism and the concession of “free speech” as a fascist talking point. It’s a political problem more than a policy problem, frankly.