Thanks for all your work! Definitely the best Lemmy app I’ve used.
I’m getting a similar error as before, regarding scrolling. I got to a point where every scroll event is causing this to appear.
I’ll see if I can reproduce it, and what the steps are.
Update: It’s the same behavior as last time. I can load about 100 posts, and then I start seeing this error on every scroll, and no more posts get loaded.
Thr LG C5 came out in 2025. It has better scores across the board.
https://www.rtings.com/tv/reviews/lg/c5-oled
Can someone buy me a 42" one? 😁
Good point. So TikTok only adds that junk when you download a video? I don’t use the app, so I didn’t know for sure, but it makes sense.
Besides, every video site lets you download their videos if you’re clever enough, and it’s a very low bar. Just use yt-dlp.
So there. That’s what I’m expecting from you. Download any TikTok video you want to share using that program so it doesn’t have the annoying tags and ad built into it. Or don’t. I really don’t care.
I was only answering your questions. I’m not the original commenter, and I would never have posted an original comment saying anything like that. But as a person clicking links on social media, I do find Tik Tok videos are annoying. Plus it bothered me that you were equating criticism of Tik Tok with criticism of the woman who made the video. It seems (to me!) like you were saying that to make the original commenter feel bad about their comment. And that made me feel bad. It wasn’t a fair thing to say. So that’s why I spoke up at all.
JOIN TIKTOK. THIS USER IS ON TIK TOK. GET ON THE PILE. JOIN THE BLOB!
This is what I hear every time I watch a Tik Tok video. Lemmy is the only social media I use because the rest is all brain rot or worse. Hell, so is Lemmy half the time.
Awesome, thank you for the quick turnaround! This has been a app-breaking issue. Actually, it’s been great. I could only scroll through the first 100 posts, and then I have to go do something else. 😂
Ummmm… That Tik Tok take out the giant logo and annoying sound from every video? What else would I be suggesting? What a silly question.
Is it not enough that the video is covered by a logo the entire time it plays? There isn’t a single other video platform that adds a logo and sound like that. Just Tik Tok. It’s a horrible precedent that I hope more companies do not follow.
This article was “cool”? It doesn’t explain anything. What the hell is a fragment? What’s the math? How does a fragment have properties of both a wave and a particle? How well does fragment theory fit with the results of quantum mechanical experiments? Does it lead to any new predictions?
You can be happy for the lady and for the puppies and not like the full-screen Tik Tok logo and annoying sound at the end of literally every video. They are completely separate things.
It’s tied or rubber banded on. Probably onto the cardboard filter.
By combining atomic electrometry with a powerful terahertz-to-light conversion technique, they achieved the first measurement of a single terahertz comb tooth—something previously impossible due to the limits of electronics and optical tools.
Healers and homeopaths have known all about terahertz stone combs for a long time. Science needs to catch up!
Oh man, I need to get one of those 360° cams just for pics like this.
Not me. I switched to using hydrogen decades ago.
This is all wrong! You can’t just connect the batteries like in the photo. You have to put the batteries on rose quartz! You will hear an amazing improvement! It is not good to put them next to each other, they must be in contact with the crystal!
Content stolen from a totally serious comment on the blog post.
We only know what we can measure. We don’t really know what an atomic nucleus looks like, for example. We can only measure what happens when another particle hits it. Between measurements, it might not even be real. We don’t even know what measurement is.
Pick your favorite quantum interpretation: Copenhagen, Broglie–Bohm, Many Worlds. We’ll probably never know the truth.
Lack of space was Fermat’s excuse for not proving his last theorem.
analysis finds that cameras lead to persistent and sustained reductions in crashes.
You should have put that in the title.
I would argue it’s still mysterious. If it were simple, we wouldn’t have what’s called the measurement problem.
Also, there is more than one way to measure something, and not all of them require a real photon to hit some particle. In the Elitzur–Vaidman bomb tester, you can “measure” whether the quantum bomb’s sensor is working or not without actually hitting it with a photon. Instead, you hit it with the “chance” of a photon hitting it, and that’s good enough. (It’ll still blow up half of the time, but you can design the tester with multiple recursive tiers to increase your tested-but-unexploded bomb yield to arbitrarily close to 100%.)
That’s pretty mysterious in my mind.
No, he just hefty!
He thinks he’s a skunk
Alright. Thanks for the update!