7·
2 years agoI think I know what the issue is.
Your colors are inverted.
The accessibility icon never follows accent color, and firewall is always red not blue. Something is swapping your colors around.
Maybe color correction for the color blind?Blue -> Yellow
Red -> Blue
4·2 years agoTheir keynotes are irrelevant, their official privacy policies and legal disclosures take precedence over marketing claims or statements made in keynotes or presentations. Apple’s privacy policy states that the company collects data necessary to provide and improve its products and services. The OS-level AI would fall under this category, allowing Apple to collect data processed by the AI for improving its functionality and models. Apple’s keynotes and marketing materials do not carry legal weight when it comes to their data practices. With the AI system operating at the OS level, it likely has access to a wide range of user data, including text inputs, conversations, and potentially other sensitive information.
Apple claimed that their privacy could be independently audited and verified.
How? The only way to truly be able to do that to a 100% verifiable degree is if it were open source, and I highly doubt Apple would do that, especially considering it’s OS level integration. At best, they’d probably only have a self-report mechanism which would also likely be proprietary and therefore not verifiable in itself.
- Malicious actors could potentially exploit vulnerabilities in the AI system to gain unauthorized access or control over device functions and data, potentially leading to severe privacy breaches, unauthorized data access, or even the ability to inject malicious content or commands through the AI system.
- Privacy breaches are possible if the AI system is compromised, exposing user data, activities, and conversations processed by the AI.
- Integrating AI functionality deeply into the operating system increases the overall attack surface, providing more potential entry points for malicious actors to exploit vulnerabilities and gain unauthorized access or control.
- Human reviewers have access to annotate and process user conversations for improving the AI models. To effectively train and improve the AI models powering the OS-level integration, Apple would likely need to collect and process user data, such as text inputs, conversations, and interactions with the AI.
- Apple’s privacy policy states that the company collects data necessary to provide and improve its products and services. The OS-level AI would fall under this category, allowing Apple to collect data processed by the AI for improving its functionality and models.
- Despite privacy claims, Apple has a history of collecting various types of user data, including device usage, location, health data, and more, as outlined in their privacy policies.
- If Apple partners with third-party AI providers, there is a possibility of user data being shared or accessed by those entities, as permitted by Apple’s privacy policy.
- With the AI system operating at the OS level, it likely has access to a wide range of user data, including text inputs, conversations, and potentially other sensitive information. This raises privacy concerns about how this data is handled, stored, and potentially shared or accessed by the AI provider or other parties.
- Lack of transparency for users about when and how their data is being processed by the AI system & users not being fully informed about data collection related to the AI. Additionally, if the AI integration is controlled solely at the OS level, users may have limited control over enabling or disabling this functionality.
you can use it in almost any app
if done rightHow are you going to be able to use it in “almost any app” in a way that is secure? How are you going to design it so that the apps don’t abuse the AI to get more information on the user out of it than intended? Seems pretty damn inherently insecure to me.
Is this why Kate dropped Markdown previews?
If you eat plants & meat, does that make you an omnist?
Being a carnivore is a religion now?
Didn’t know my cat was a religious nut job.
Oh yeah? Then explain this!! /s
A Screenshot would be helpful to better visualize what you’re describing.
“Simple by default, powerful when needed” - KDE
Yeah, at first I was like “oh no, sounds super serious” then I read “batch files” and was like “bruh ರ_ರ”.
It’s not “autism”, it’s brainrot induced from preditory content marketed at children.
Out of curiosity, What do you use it for?
1·2 years agoYesterday I
[Send]
Beat the fuck
[Send]
Out of
[Send]
My Wife
[Send] (me calling the cops)
So fucking bad
[Send]
In Overwatch
[Send]
That she
[Send]
Rage quit
[Send]The cops get to their door right after sending “Rage quit”.
Translation : “I run worthless crapware via Termux on them, that ends up generating negative income once you factor in electricity cost”.
Nice.
Don’t forget to put [Solved] in your post title.