

The thing limiting it most is the last sentence, the rest I’ve seen as well :D
The thing limiting it most is the last sentence, the rest I’ve seen as well :D
That’s sad :( I mean I see people without helmets as well on a regular basis but the “because of looks” irritates me I have to admit. Perhaps I’m just naturally filtering those people and I’m just “protected” by my bubble
Even in this utopia I see the need because any crash can be dangerous for the head. I just don’t get the idea behind “oh no, my priorities are with my hair, not my brain”.
I’m completely with you.
I have literally never hear of “helm sceptics” and this sounds like a made up controversy to me to be frank.
Then you threw in a source list longer then my attention span which I’m very grateful for!
Would you mind giving a bit of context for where you’re from? The worst thing I’ve heard in Germany is “everyone should be free to choose and it’s my head I risk” which, while not agreeing with, I can understand.
Thanks in advance!
Old knowledge disclaimer, but if they didn’t change it then:
Because Apple literally tells people that they’re not allowed to charge less somewhere else - at least that was the case several years ago…
We’re not allowed to call him that anymore. He went by “the Artist” until his death. Man, fuck Warner Bros.
What where we talking about?
In this reply you you talked about “some breads”, the OP Post only talks about bread - and that for sure had only ingredients in using at home.
Same for French fries: potato, salt, fat .
I’m with the poor downvoted fellow, I don’t understand where the risk comes from when it’s described this vague.
Are home made burgers better? Is it the freezing process and I should lower my meal prep? Is it additives?
The impulse to start talking or interrupting people you can pin to ADHD no problem - but tunnel firing for a whole dialogue discussing a problem?
Yes there is but it’s because of German law in they regard. And as it has to be approved by a governance body in public there is no chance of obfuscating it.
Normally that is a good thing from my point of view as it prevent shady weapons deals - but this is not a normal situation :(
That’s not an opinion: that’s uneducation on how to read data. Your own link shows the pay gap by gender when accounting for homosexuality. Literally.
And they even describe it.
Or is your opinion “the data is wrong” and I misunderstood?
It’s cheap and uninteresting clickbait.
Why do you assume that the downvotes are “I don’t understand this” instead of “this is spammy bullshit”?
I disagree: there are no stupid questions - but there are loaded questions, questions with wrong assumptions baked in or statements with a questionmark attached.
Small difference but I found my life way better when differentiating between “person doesn’t know l” and “person wants to be a troll”.
Did qobuz by now implement a way to check their catalogue without agreeing to an abo? As far as I know they haven’t …
I won’t check them out if they have such shady practices and I wish people would stop recommending them to be honest: that’s just predatory to link a trial to a credit card and not give any option to browse the offering even without listening.
Correct - I wanted to compare my Spotify playlists with the alternatives but qobuz wants a credit card before allowing you to check their offer… Won’t do that.
Did qobuz by now implement a way to check their catalogue without agreeing to an abo?
I won’t switch to a company that obfuscates their offer behind a paywall.
Who would that be in this case?
Do whatever is most comfortable for you :) My opinion!
From your linked article:
"While the term was defined originally to mean “methods and attitudes typical of or attributed to natural scientists”, some scholars, as well as political and religious leaders, have also adopted it as a pejorative term with the meaning “an exaggerated trust in the efficacy of the methods of natural science applied to all areas of investigation”
That "worshipping " wording is, by your own sources, a political act.
Pulling a definition out of your arse and then judging a whole group of people based on your made up beliefs… You’re not an anarchist, you’re a trumpist in decline, pitching people against each others instead of standing up for others.
If your problem with Bitcoin is that it’s a made up currency then I have vers bad news about gold for you.
And all other currencies.
That plan is ludicrous for a lot of reasons but you chose to mention the only two that are not it
I really like the question, thank you! The answer is a clear “yes, but”:
Your assumption is absolutely correct, light surfaces reflect more light back and heat up less because of this.
Noe if your display heats up less depends on the amount of energy it uses to generate that white:
For an e ink display it would be basically the same as a bright vs dark paper of the same color. But OLED for example uses constant energy to generate the white image: So it’s depending on how bright the sun shines vs how much heat gets generated by the display itself.
Still only looking at the sun’s energy it would be smaller. If the overall temperature would be lower depends on exactly how bright the sun would be vs how efficient the specific display is!