
“64.6% of men are at least slightly toxic. Conclusion: most men are not toxic”
What the heck?

“64.6% of men are at least slightly toxic. Conclusion: most men are not toxic”
What the heck?


Dumber?
Have you not seen the state of humanity?

On one hand, slop, on the other, vibe coding


I can also predict it, with a crystal ball and tarot cards, and it’s probably going to be as safe if not more


Ah yes, what could go wrong


“Macron a menti” je pense que ça ne choque plus qui que ce soit. Il le faisait de façon évidente avant même d’être élu et ça a empiré depuis


Tout le monde sait que tant qu’il pleut au moins une fois par an, le réchauffement climatique n’existe pas
Self-fulfilling prophecy?
When you buy an nft, you but a number (and since you can’t own a number, you buy nothing).
The fact that you got scammed because some people told you that this number gives you ownership of anything is meaningless.
With your example of a dollar, it would be as if you were given monopoly money and you were going around thinking that you’re rich. Sure, if you find people that fell in the same scam, they might accept your fake money as payment, but that’s the extent of it. It’s basically a group of deluded people who imagine that they have something of value while they simply have a meaningless paper.
That is also why you can easily print monopoly money, but not real money. One has a value, the other doesn’t.
You’re literally trying to pretend that it’s racist to criticise a cartoon of the racist stereotype of a “terrorist” which is a dark skinned Muslim.
On top of that, the joke (that isn’t really a joke and doesn’t really work anyway) could have worked with a million situations that wouldn’t imply terrorists.
The real core of the joke here is “look at these stupid arabs, they just explode themselves like dumb fucks, lol”. That’s the intention of the comic, that’s what it tries to convey, and I don’t know if you’re actually not seeing the problem, or deluding yourself because you laughed at the comic and refused to admit that you’re wrong, but you are doing the typical thing that a racist would do. So maybe think about what you’re defending, before defending it.
Wow, colorblindness at its peak
This is a load of crap


And that is why I like the ability to tag users as creeps on lemmy


They make a big deal out of saying that they hand-pick games and make sure they’re good and proper, then they take responsibility of quality problems of the games that are available.
And last I checked you cannot filter. If you do a search, sure, but not on the main page, and during times like around Valentine’s day, the website starts looking like a weird porn website. Also, they claim that they select good games, and no one is going to make me believe that those porn games are good quality games.


Yeah, totally not a nazi perspective, after all no crimes of war were committed in the name of science ever


They’ve been pushing a stupid launcher for tracking, have been selling non-up-to-date games, non-drm-free games, incomplete games (ex: no linux version while it is on steam), pushing weird porn games on the front page just because they sell, etc.
It’s been getting worse and worse over the past ~5 years, and I never saw it get better.


Gog has been going to shit so it cannot get much worse.


That’s why the effort needs to be done to stop AIs legally, and by disabling profit from them (or disabling capitalism altogether but that’s another subject), not by continuing to maintain the hype and investments in AIs.


Oh non, qui aurait pu penser que des armes à feu seraient liées à de la violence ?
And it includes people who are slightly to moderately toxic, which is why my sentence said “at least slightly toxic”
That’s my exact point that you somehow missed, the article concludes that most men are not toxic while saying that only ~30% are not toxic.
What they actually concluded is “89.2% of men are not extremely toxic” but that’s not what the article implied