

All because Elon thinks yellow caution paint isn’t aesthetic enough for his god damn factory.


All because Elon thinks yellow caution paint isn’t aesthetic enough for his god damn factory.
The claim is direct funding from RFK Jr. And a deliberate end goal of the study for his purposes. Not that the study is good or bad but that it is a nefarious plot by RFK Jr.
My mistake I thought it was a reply in the other comment thread.
The thing that makes it possibly a good study is that it was published in a good journal from a good school. It’s not Harry Wang’s Big Book of Science. You expect poorly done research in pay to play journals, but less so in biomedcentral.
I’m still mildly skeptical and have seen people make the claim that it was more likely the age of the mother which has been legitimately associated with higher risks of autism. It makes sense. But having now seen that they’re pushing this shit super hard I’m immediately on guard.
I hadn’t seen the Trump TV announcement of this dumb shit. This is something worthy of further study not a doctor’s recommendation.
Sorry about asking for fucking proof of your claims. I guess we just rely on vibes to judge truthiness.
I added it in to my previous response but I figure I’ll just do it as a reply. The study was submitted in May so he very well may have seen it come up in his autism alerts. I’m sure he has some kind of autism study feed.
Oh boy, I sure do love getting all of my comments downvoted by you cunts just because you don’t like what I had to say. That sure proves me wrong…
Some kind of connection between the authors of the study and RFK Jr. Lots of studies get lots of funding from lots of different places so the source of the funding is not exactly a smoking gun.
It was submitted in May so he may have been tipped off about it because that’s kind of his special autistic focus ironically.
Easy to state but do you have any proof of the connection? I’ve seen refutations of the study claiming the connection was merely the previously understood connection between the age of the mother and autism risk, but that’s just random internet comments.
What you’re claiming is something much more sinister than a mere mistake.
I hate the guy as much as anybody but it is a real study.


It’s funny that anybody would expect models trained on information from current doctors to not have the same blind spots.
I’m really surprised every screen gets a whole computer. Why can’t there be one feeding data to every screen? Seems like a massive waste.


Plenty of people have done it with the help of others. I’ve never heard of it being so ridiculous as this.


Jesus Christ, why?


While LEO satellite internet remains stupid, this is just line of sight radio transmission. Nothing new, and certainly not anything like starlink.
Experts know you have to smell it REALLY hard to know it’s quality cheese.


Chrome is a big money maker for Google because they can see everything you do.


Always has been.
Wasn’t there a mid-century sci-fi story about that? Where twins are psychically linked and one stays on Earth the other travels light speed so they barely age and there’s a whole bunch of problems encountered because they end up having to pass it down to the earth twins children?
Time for the Stars by Robert A Heinlein


A space object older than another space object? But da bible says we were here first!
Not particularly surprising.


Absolute banger.
Same as everywhere else: If you don’t like it block it. Don’t decide what everybody else should see.