Unlike their boomer ancestors, the current generations talk with their partners about all sorts of things, not just about sex and dinner. Almost as if they are not only sexual partners but also close friends that understand each other.
TL;DR: Ok, boomer.
Slammed!
From one internet stranger to another: you are valid. For the naysayers no amount of official recognition would matter anyway.
EDIT: Your anger is also valid and justified.
Now pronounce Qt.
I don’t see how we would make them afraid without any implied threat of violence though. Apart from that, I wholeheartedly agree with you.
I’m pretty sure we all agree that violence is a bad solution. The problem is we’re all out of good ones. What are the alternatives at this point?
The mobile version of Papers Please is exquisite. I highly recommend reading the developer’s documentary of it: https://dukope.com/devlogs/papers-please/mobile/
Hey, a little respect for the developer of PuTTY. (yes, it’s the same guy)
The password cannot contain the Epstein’s client list.
They can have it. We just don’t want to federate with them, which doesn’t prevent them from having their own instance all for themselves.
This is just a meme, right? Right…?
This is a great stance for disagreements. Not so much for an actual danger!
I mean, we’re all taught for the whole life that the fire extinguishers and fire alarms are absolutely off limits. I’m pretty sure that during a fire I would still hesitate to break the glass and press the fire alarm button.
For the record, you’ve used en-dash here, not em-dash. These are used mostly for number/date ranges. Em-dash is even longer: — vs – vs -
As a person that has been using en-dash and em-dash for years, this is annoying me as hell that they are used as a telltale sign of AI slop. I’m just a typography nerd, not AI!
I guess them being a holocaust museum doesn’t need to imply they are against it. Good to know who they actually are.
I’m doing okay then. Thanks for providing a baseline.
What are you talking about? Ringtones were the original paid cosmetics!
It’s as if a woman’s looks boil down to: age, ethnicity, hair style, hair color, body size/shape, and boob size.
If we’re lucky, we might get eye color. But never any facial details. Never any description of the shape of eyes, mouth, or nose.
Even sexism aside, I can respect if someone can describe these well just because I can’t even begin to describe my own features like these, much less someone else’s.
Elliot Would