“The future ain’t what it used to be.”
-Yogi Berra
- 146 Posts
- 3.24K Comments
29·9 hours agovengeful ghost of Fred Rogers
Be the vengeful ghost you want to see in the world
6·11 hours agoAnd Weevil’s right. This goes much, much further back than Donald. He’s really only doing what the US has always done, and just doesn’t care to hide it like his predecessors tried to.
FlashMob is right about Weevil being right.
And if you’ve got an hour and a half to dedicate to a podcast, here is that debate played out on stage, with a fun role reversal because at the time it was Obama in office. Please note the cynicism of the “conservatives” arguing for the motion.
2593·13 hours agobased af and morally acceptable use of AI.
6·2 days agoWhichever makes the story more interesting
clips to the mainframe
I’m in
5·2 days agoThat seems to be the thrust of their criticism. No problem with the action, simply disappointed that he didn’t ask for permission.
Utterly worthless, and the both of them need to be replaced, 9 months ago when they demonstrated their inability to meet the moment
Ah yes. Let’s ideate on a person we have no control or influence over instead of people in political power whom we do have a degree of influence over. Surely spinning our tires over how bad Trump is instead of focusing pressure on, at least allegedly, politically aligned individuals we might be able to make demands of.
Shouting into the void about ‘Trump’ bad instead of focusing criticism where it might make a difference is a better strategy.
We get it. “Orange man bad”, but Schumer’s and Jefferies basically supporting this is actually worse because they are litterally the only tools we have at our disposal to stop him.
No and both Schumer and Jefferies appear to be complicit, at least via the bird site.
The profen the profen
The profen the profen
Robocop couldn’t stop me pukin’ and flushin’
No balls to be bustin’, no fightin’, no cussin’
Just love for a drug called I boo profen
27·3 days agoI legit forgot Schumer even existed
13·3 days agoCan we do better than the rightwing rag, The Washington Examiner?
General strike.
Do we even fucking need the oil though? We’re a net exporter.
2·3 days agoI agree that in general meta analysis stands apart, but I brought it up because it’s so often coupled with a deep review of material like a review article would hold. It’s also totally valid to cite a review article as a primary source, but I tend not to prefer this in my writing. My reasons for this are two fold, first, one of my memories was a curmudgeon who insisted on going all the way back through any chain if claims and citations to find, originally source, and reevaluate each claim. And, in doing so, regularly found irregularities and misattributed statements or just straight up mysteries of where the hell someone got something from. Its a pita, but it pays to be detail oriented when evaluating claims a domain has just accepted as table stakes.
This litterally happened to me recently where I was trying to figure out how this, fairly well known author had determined the functional form they were fitting to a curve. And like, three or four citations deep and a coffee with a colleague of theirs later, it turns out “they just made that shit up”.
That’s a really nice layout.
Genuinely and without irony, thank you for creating content last year and into this next year, whatever it brings. Some days its the one of the only things I get a chuckle out of.
What a fucking coward.