Their story is basicly the real life inspiration for succession

Their story is basicly the real life inspiration for succession

Not always though

Yeah but its is justified, as he needs to be closer to God.

Vastly onesided, especially the shutdown of the nuclear plants. They only accounted for 11% of electrical energy production during peak activity. I don’t see how you could have convinced people to build 10x more nuclear plants to achieve net zero, given the huge prior resistance i.e. “Atomkraft, nein Danke”. I agree to the blunder in so far that she failed to accelarate the transirion to renewables at the begin of the millenia. Which was probably no realistic option due to internal party resistance.

The bigger question here and this I think is what subcontiously resonates with this this story is why do you even punish and I think there are three partly compeeding answers.

• First because you want to avoid such thing from happening again

• Secondly because you try to scare people from doing the same

• Thirdly because you want fellons to reflect on there behavior and give them a path to redemption

For the second goal I point at the fact that it happened although this sentence is possible.

Inderd I did. You started with:

[…] He traveled to murder a guy he never met before after stalking him online, carved words from a manifesto into bullet casings, engineered a 3D printable unregistered firearm, fled the scene of the crime with enough cash to live off of for years, and openly denies any wrongdoing by pleading innocent. He is absolutely likely to try it again, or perhaps worse, if released.

If the death penalty exists, and honestly I don’t think it should, then it should apply fairly and treat all human life equally.

This is why I mentioned possible jailtime in my previous comment as a lesser evil and made the point that your represented pov is a logical falacy as it is based on a non existing moral dilemma. So the only thing it represents is an argument of authority.

Still a not a valid argument. It is an argument of authority, a typical logical fallacy. Just because a group of people is reputable and says it right does not mean it is right. I mean a possible jail sentence would be as adequate to prevent him from doing it again, as a counter example. So the argument for killing him would basically narrow down to “because authorities said it is okay”.

Just for the sake of argument. You say that because he killed and probably will kill again, death penalty is justifiable . By the same line of reasoning this should be valid as well for the judge, the attorney and every other person responsible for the final execution. You could even make the argument for the victim, as he killed people by actively rejecting proper medical care in multiple cases.

Most of the german ones get translated the weeks after the congress

Good Job Kowalski! 🐧

https://github.com/mayflower/PayForMe

• ihatemoney.org -> French FOSS Alternative
• Cospend -> Nextcloud App

Both work with moneybuster on Android

That used to be called Catholicism ^^

Heat to my meat

deleted by creator

It is about the wikimedia content creators not getting a proper share while the wikimedia foundation acts basicly like Peta, Green Peace and other “Charity”-Buisnesses by using drastic and guildinducing ads even in third world countries. The server activty is funded for aprox the next 100 years and the content is created for free. Most of the money is therefore actually going to around 700 employees in the adminstration, that work on new projects, lobbying or ideas like wikimedia enterprise. But this in turn is not what the ads imply.