

Honestly regulating businesses to ensure fair and ethical competition and trade is something I like my tax dollars being spent on.
I play guitar, watch USMLR and NHL, occasionally brew beer, enjoy live music and travel, and practice sarcasm.
Mastodon - @baronvonj@mas.to
Pixelfed - @baronvonj@pixelfed.social
Honestly regulating businesses to ensure fair and ethical competition and trade is something I like my tax dollars being spent on.
I know you weren’t replying to me, but … what?
I don’t doubt it, and I 100% support regulations aimed at increasing wealth and ownership opportunity and equality. If Compass is shown to be discriminating against minorities, then yeah prosecute the fuck out of them. I just think forcing people to list their home even though they already have a buyer selected isn’t really going to do anything about it and just artificially raises the sale price to cover the realtor fees. Say some elderly home owner is nearing hospice or something and wants to sell the house to their grandkid who is starting a family. Why should they have to do anything other than get a mortgage approved and go sign all the deed/title paperwork for the bank and the county? Forcing it to be listed isn’t going to suddenly make that home be an option for a discriminated minority buyer, because the buyer has already been selected by the owner.
No, dude. Redlining is about banks not lending to people in a discriminatory fashion. The first sentence in your link:
Redlining is a discriminatory practice in which financial services are withheld from neighborhoods that have significant numbers of racial and ethnic minorities.
I quoted a line specifically about the home owner (a person, not a bank or a coporation) having a specific buyer in mind. Not at all the same thing. Even if the owner lists it publicly, the owner still decides to whom they sell the property. Otherwise you would have property-holding companies out there suing to force the sale to them as the highest cash bidder. Forcing a public MLS listing is regulatory capture forcing buyers and sellers to pay a commission to a middle-man when there didn’t need to be one.
HOAs can fuck off and so can you.
Some homeowners want to sell to a neighbor or family member without broad advertising
So? Why should they need to broadly advertise it? It’s a private property transaction. It’s not like it’s government public property.
That doesn’t contradict the implication that she doesn’t like him.
That was my first thought, too. Also I really need to watch this documentary.
Welcome to Blue Texas, where we keep our gerries mandered.
Than 49.8% of voting US Americans, and 100% of eligible-but-not-voting US Americans.
Heckling? That sounds like Latin gang talk! Deport him from the club!
Yes, exactly like that. Whoever shares a picture with you. Whoever brags about it. “Did she give you permission to share this? Prove it! No? That’s not ok. I’m letting her know.”
Shit like this needs to be called out by decent men, directly to the faces of the offenders. Challenge their belief that all men are like that. It’s so disheartening to know that I stand out amongst the crowd for treating women with basic dignity and respect. I try so hard to teach my boys about respecting boundaries.
Fucking please turn up in the 2026 primaries and general. We need it so god damn badly.
What idealism?
Probably things like “but the mods do that work for free, we should make things better for them” and “but we have no original content, it’s the users who provide value, we should make things better for them.” You know, stuff like that.
I always found it amusing how the term “entitlement” has been butchered by Americans.
In this case it’s a deliberate misuse by the GOP to conflate the word with welfare programs that the voters see as free handouts to the lazy. So then they can tout polling data that shows voters against entitlement programs as fodder to gut/end social security and Medicare. I’m constantly having to have this discussion with conservatives when they use the word incorrectly.
Orangutans are pretty smart. Don’t do them dirty like that.
They get 3/5 of due process. They get duepro.
Right. The sentence I quoted was kind of wedged in with the reporting on what you’re stating. So it seemed like associating the two, and I didnt really see the direct private sale as something to have lumped in (to report on as something nefarious).