Or the more likely case, they know exactly what they are doing and are complicit.

Is alternating case not the standard format for unescaped sarcasm?

Hey that’s not fair, they recently added tabs to their file explore. I mean sure it has a shared history, so if you open a new tab and navigate, then return to the previous tab back takes to you their useless ‘home screen’, but still, there are tabs kinda!

I mean, if you can’t talk about killing oligarchs, is it really action??

Well that’s the power of federation.

I don’t understand what you mean.

Killing someone because of their nationally, race, or job, is wrong.

One of these things is not like the others.

What about this, instead we just take that 1.5 mill a year and put it towards things that actual solve problems, rather than making sure we have the best and brights super soldiers doing traffic stops and taking notes on your break in.

One would think this limitation would give economists some humility when finding conflict with other fields, but it seems quite the opposite.

For you to make the comment in this context, I think they are more equal than you are willing to admit.

deleted by creator

“If you own a plantation, slavery is in your best interest.”

This was the term I’ve heard, but damn does it sound terfy…

Humans always reproduced to the absolute limit

My understanding is that this is not true. The big factor seems to be infant mortality, as that drops so does the average number of children per breeding pair.

Agreed, I don’t think the solution exists electorally.

I’ve never been more excited about ruining my eyes 🤩

Trump is absolutely poorly qualified, and terrible beyond that. I think fundamentally I believe more in politics and values than competence in navigating the systems of a white supremacist country.

With regards to a ‘left maga’ you say but still, but still what? If someone broke norms, rules, even laws in service of dismantling the prison industrial complex, jailed politicians in service of making right the genocide in Gaza, or instituted a state of emergency over climate change to align with the scientific consensus, would you argue that the norms of our country are more important?

The tea party had a lot of astroturfing. Again we look at how Sanders, AOC, and Hogg are treated to see how the structural power of the part will be turned against those that push back even a bit on their insular geriatric views. I see value in what you’re describing, I think I just see transforming the democratic party as more of a trap of energy than causing the needed change that people actually want.

The true radicalization is when you realize that being “highly-qualified” for the presidency should be disqualifying as it means you’re so well entrenched in the particular brand of pre-Trump American fascism.

That path doesn’t involve the DNC. Look at how they treated David Hogg, of all people.