I’m sorry for being a little bit late and missed your text but he said that I just don’t want you back

Ellie from The Last of Us part 2. Say what you will about the story (I liked it, but I get the criticism), Ellie is pretty universally loved.

I’d be scared too, that’s way more Trump voters than Kamala got!

Doesn’t look promising from what I’ve seen so far. I will try to keep an open mind and wait for reviews to start coming in, but honestly the atmosphere and vibes are what I love most about Metroid games. Having a companion (especially an annoying one that you need to babysit) could easily sour me on any game, let alone a Metroid game.

Unlikely since he appears in the recent trailer where Samus has upgraded armor along with several other federation pals. There’s also a log entry for him alongside 5 empty spaces, indicating you’ll need to do this rescue/escort thing with 6 different NPCs throughout the game.

Early previews of Metroid Prime 4 prominently feature a companion that you rescue in the first area, who tags along for a large portion of the playtime. He makes dumb quips: “It’s about to get real nerdy in here”, screams when enemies appear: “Is everything on this planet trying to kill us?”, states very obvious things: “missiles work better on enemies with hard shells” and nags you about what to do at any given moment: “You want something to shoot? Try that piston”.

He’s also an escort that you need to protect or you get a game over.

Not all Detroit natives are kid rock fans, but all kid rock fans are Detroit natives.

The industries that I choose not to financially support do, hence why I don’t support them.

There are also moral virtues.

I disagree with your line of logic then. Something doesn’t need to be a moral duty to be moral. It’s not a moral duty for a poor person to donate to charity, but being charitable is a moral act.

Similarly, you can probably point to edge cases where the following line of logic cannot be applied broadly due to people’s circumstances.

For me personally,

1. Livestock animals are sentient, they display a preference to live and be free from suffering and confinement.

2. I do not need to purchase animal products to be healthy and happy.

3. In the absence of necessity, intentionally confining, harming and killing animals is not morally justifiable.

How could I agree or disagree if I have no reasoning for your position? You made the claim that veganism is amoral, that’s an uncommon and interesting position. I’m curious about your reasoning.

You keep making claims without elaborating on them. If you just don’t want to talk about it, that’s cool.

Are you saying that morality does not factor into how humans treat animals?

What’s your ethical argument for not being vegan?

The top two stick to the back of the phone and provide a rubber cover for the USB c port. Everything else either scrapes away debris or wipes the port clean with isopropyl alcohol. Bottom right appears to be fashioned from a zip tie and probably didn’t come in the kit.

Help me out here then. You said being vegan and not being vegan are both ethical choices, like the trolley problem.

In the trolley problem, an ethical case can be made for pulling the lever or not, so I thought you were saying an ethical argument could be made for both being vegan and not being vegan. I was curious to hear your argument for the latter.

Can you elaborate on what you actually meant?

Curious to hear your explanation for how being non-vegan can be more ethical than being vegan. I’ve heard some people make interesting cases for this, by the way, but I’ve yet to see one that can be practically applied as an alternative to our current food system.

Nah I’m good actually…

Your comment had me hopeful that I had missed news about David Duke’s death.