that’s quite dishonest because LLMs have had all manner of facts pre-trained on it with datacenters all over the world catering to it. If you think it can learn in the real world without many many iterations and it still needs pushing and proding on simple tasks that humans perform then I am not convinced.

It’s like saying a chess playing computer program like stockfish is a good indicator of intelligence because it knows to play chess but you forgot that the human chess players’ expertise was used to train it and understand what makes a good chess program.

Bazzinga

“embodies the elegance of simplicity”

corporate speak that doesn’t mean anything. Also If you are talking to the creator of a programming language they already know that. That was the goal of the language.

“Plan 9 from bell labs, another landmark achievement”

the sentence is framed as if its a school essay where the teacher asked the question “describe the evolution of unix and linux in 300 words”

“The sam and Acme editors which showcase your philosophy of powerful, minimal design”

Again explaining how good software is to the author. Also note how this sentence could have been a question in a school essay: “What are the design philosopies behind the sam and acme editors?”

you use your mouth and hands so he should be fine

Yeah but you wouldn’t see a real palestine supporter pissing on a Hamas terrorist on fire.

You should know that the former NYC mayor banned criticism/divestment of/from Israel thus creating a domestic law about a foreign nation. Mamdani is simply removing that domestic law and thus erasing a foreign nation from New York’s governance dictionary.

He is actually doing what you are asking for.

“brat” is such a milquetoast description for a human trafficking rapist pedophile

I wonder how he spends his days nowadays apart from xhitting

https://lemmy.world/post/40930220

Billionaires don’t have billions in their bank accounts. That’s not how wealth works.

This is a strawman argument used by dishonest business types who think everybody else is dumb about how wealth works. Nobody is saying billionaires have billions in their bank accounts.

The vast majority of it is tied to property and businesses

Right you are on the same page as the rest of the people arguing against the existence of billionaires.

The number of properties held by a person should be limited to one. Ideally having a clause saying that it has to be on rent for a regulated price. And individuals cannot own a majority of business unless it’s a one man job. I would like the world to head towards worker owned cooperatives instead of 0.01% hoarding 90% of the wealth.

Thinking that just because one could comfortably retire that they should is kind of like telling a runner to stop running after having completed their first marathon. They’re a runner - runners run.

So the entire neo-liberal thesis is that we should reward psychopaths. That’s kind of a non-starter for sustainable living.

A person who became a billionaire views making money the same way. It’s what they do. It’s what they’re good at and derive meaning from.

I can’t begin to tell you the enormous amount of problems with this statement with regards to somebody’s mental health. You can’t be a billionaire without causing suffering to other people. Without leaving somebody else with the short end of the stick. Kindness is alien to people who think this is okay and should be encouraged. This level of worship of money is quite deviant because civilization evolved and thrives on cooperation, not on some misconstrued notion that a single person can derive so much “value” such that they can demand 99% or more of wealth.>

I actually think we need more people who hate MBAs to go through the degree so we can tell whats bullshit and whats not.

unfortunately that’s how the “game” is setup so a lot of dudes think they’re just doing the right thing.

I can understand this to an extent. Its the same with copying code you didn’t understand from stackoverflow.

the primary driver for the ban is not “hot new thing” but code on which no thought has been put into or copied blindly with zero context around it.

what i meant to convey was its difficult to find men who don’t think this is a revelation. i.e it would be hard to find a dude who isn’t offended by a rejection.

except you’re logic fails in the past. The dude with the gun got subdued by the unarmed dude. And in America a bunch of dudes with guns with license to kill didn’t stop the killing of children in Uvalde.

I’m going to steal it

hehe

it’s certainly not 100% fake either.

the revelation is that there are actually mature enough people to admit this is real problem instead of getting defensive, whatabouting, or gaslighting the other person

I read “sexiest stereotypes” and got confused as to why you would want to stop them.

edit: OP seems to have a problem with my comment

its too sad for me to accept the usage of an emoji on that piece of terrible news. Like if it was a CEO i wouldn’t have posted this comment. Losing a scientist hurts.

ok i stepped onto that one myself.