

Same, it’s so fucking good. Easily my AOTY.


Same, it’s so fucking good. Easily my AOTY.


Comments can be marked as an Answer, like on StackOverflow.
Was anything changed about how this federates? If no, what protections are in place against someone just patching their instance software to always return an "answer": true on Notes?


This could just be one sed command:
echo $line | sed -E 's/TH|[EL ]|DO//g'


Earlier this week, I announced the immediate availability of a reference implementation for the Public Key Directory–a project I’ve been working on since June 2024. Hundreds of people shared it on Mastodon and BlueSky. Comparatively, almost nobody on Hacker News ever saw it.
I’ll admit I missed this despite it being posted in !technology@lemmy.world. Lumping Masto and Bluesky together here is weird though given the Masto post got 300+ boosts while the Blusky post got 25 reposts.

No, but why get behind a fascist sympathiser when a better project exists: servo.org.

This is whataboutery.

Too bad it’s made by someone who promotes ‘great replacement’ theory and stands with fascists.


It would be on brand for Bethesda given that that Long 15 mod just came out.


I can recreate this, the error I’m seeing on the server side is Page limit is > 10. I wish client side gave a better error message here than counldnt_get_posts.
This seems to have been a deliberately changed in this PR to fix comment list sorting DDOS exploit. How this affects clients depends on if they use page or page_cursor, which has no limit.
For now I’ll just patch our Lemmy to increase to increase the limit to something more reasonable, like 100. Probably need to upstream this as well as it’ll affect every instance on 0.19.14.


It’s not just about providing work itself, but also giving people the support they need to get into work. Eg, 40% of people on out of work benefits are on a NHS waiting list.


Bryan Lunduke, Linux Youtuber/‘influencer’ who went down the antivaxx rabbit hole and became a raving conspiracy theorist.


Wow, that’s bad. I would hate working with this so much.


Even if we see someone behave immorally, they can always repent.
Well, unless you believe in predestination.
Anyway, this is getting pretty far from either the video or King’s Army so I’m going to stop engaging.


You say that like Christian identity isn’t quite political. Even so, the way this organisation operates is distinctively political.


Genuinely, what even is the point of Labour at this point? “Unlike Reform and the Tories, we don’t want to leave the ECHR. We just want to make it utterly anaemic.”


of numbers instead of human-readable names
TBF, they have introduced a ‘verified’ system that lets you use human readable names.


You don’t have to wonder, the spell it out on their website:
We are not a political organization. We don’t stand for, represent, or align ourselves with any political party.
Still, I think campaigning against specific policy would meet the average person’s definition of political organisation.
Kinda like if the King would say climate change is bad, it’s political but it doesn’t really compromise his position as apolitical
Maybe when all the (major) parties agreed that climate change was real you could argue this, but now both Reform and the Tories are both doing climate change denial I don’t think you can. Besides, the idea that the monarch is apolitical when it uses its privileged position within the British state to lobby for the monarch’s personal interest against things like workers’ rights and, ironically enough, climate laws is plainly absurd.


Chris is probably just following the comm rule against editorialising titles.
Polanski is doing one as well, but at the same time as the King’s Speech. This is apparently just a feature of British politics now.
https://youtu.be/lopMMkz0law