• 49 Posts
  • 4.45K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 30th, 2023

help-circle





  • I get people that won’t put any effort in…

    But why are you spending your free time online lying about politics and what actions others are taking?

    Or if you’re going to claim ignorance, why not spend your free time learning about what’s happening instead of making random uninformed guesses on social media and trying to sound confident?

    Like, why are you doing any of what you’re doing right now?

    Is this one of those “discussion is important” devils advocate things where you just say random shit to drive engagement? You know that’s just trolling, right?






  • because it’d become apparent, without a doubt, that those in power cannot be imprisoned.

    They absolutely can…

    The people who won’t do their jobs, are not doing their jobs because of a personal risk assessment. Maybe they’d go down too, maybe they wouldn’t get a bribe that substantially increases their quality of life.

    But every person enabling this shit, is doing it because it’s “safer” for them.

    We change what they decide to do by making it “safer” for them to do the right thing. Either passively by keeping them safe and secure after doing the right thing. Or giving them a credible fear of what happens if no one gets held accountable.

    The French royal guard was full of people willing to die for the royal family, right up until members of the French royal guard were killed for getting between a guillotine and a royal.

    Because their risk/reward math changed.

    It’s not even human nature, single cell organisms are doing it constantly. It’s the most basic question for biological life, and why intelligence even evolved: “Is this reward worth the risk?”

    Besides…

    Society would collapse

    The instant a “society” collapses, a new society is there. It’s like “weather” we can say the weather changes, but it never goes away. What cames after might be better or worse, but there’s never just nothing.




  • because they lacked a warrant when they searched his backpack after Mangione was apprehended in a Pennsylvania McDonald’s

    The cops figuratively shoot themselves in the foot, because they’re so used to plea deals they forgot how a lawful investigation is supposed to work.

    They claimed there was danger and that’s why they apprehended him and separated him from his bag without Miranda. But forgot that once that happened, they were no longer legally allowed to search the bag without a warrant because there was no imment threat.

    Then even after searching the bag, they found nothing.

    Until after the bag was at the station and searched again.

    The single cop who drove the bag to the station was photographed leaving with no gloves on, testified there was no reason she’d have put gloves on while driving, but was photographed with gloves on while turning the bag in.

    It’s going to be insane if anything from the bag is admitted, and since it’s “public knowledge” what was in the bag it’s influenced every potential juror and may be grounds for a mistrial already.

    I feel like they’re dragging it out because they know it’s gonna be bad, but that’s not going to help anything, people aren’t just going to stop caring about this.





  • One author is in the federalist society (the reason SC is corrupt)…

    And the other seems to believe international laws shouldn’t exist and Israel is totally cool…

    They want us to “accept” it’s corrupt and somehow do away with the entire notion of a SC and replace it with some “populist rule”.

    Similarly, progressives are increasingly converging on the idea of both expanding and “disempowering” federal courts. Attentive to the reality that the supreme court especially is not and rarely has been their friend, left-leaning advocates are finding ways to empower ordinary people, trading the hollow hope of judicial power for the promise of popular rule.

    To label as “nihilists” those sketching an alternate, more democratic future is, in other words, not only mistaken but outright bizarre. Rather than adhere to the same institutionalist strategies that helped our current crisis, reformers must insist on remaking institutions like the US supreme court so that Americans don’t have to suffer future decades of oligarchy-facilitating rule that makes a parody of the democracy they were promised.

    In Trump’s second term, the Republican-appointed majority on the supreme court has brought their institution to the brink of illegitimacy. Far from pulling it back from the edge, our goal has to be to push it off.

    They’re right wingers trying to hijack progressivism to destroy the SC after it changes all the laws to how they want, and before the left can use it as a weapon to change the laws back.

    I’d love to say people won’t be naive enough to fall for this, but I don’t want to lie


  • givesomefucks@lemmy.worldtoPolitical Memes@lemmy.worldRent-free in Trump's head
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    So he did it…

    But he didn’t…

    Did you know someone made a song about this exact thing?

    Grandson: we did it!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LNOGN9jXGYA

    Quick edit:

    The song was released when Biden took office, and was about how if everyone just stopped pushing then, Biden wouldn’t actually do anything and we’d be right back where we started.

    Literally what happened.

    You are expressing the opinions that it was “good enough” and we couldn’t have pushed for more, and it led to what the song predicted.

    It’s just wild the song was early and correct, and you’re after the fact but still wrong.

    What reality are you living in?