“Wanting to be offended” is a myth perpetuated by people who want to be offensive. Nobody “wants” to be offended. Offence is a genuine emotional reaction, is automatic, and is unpleasant. Cut that bullshit out.

Imagine messing up halfway through a terrible rape scene

Well yeah

We’re always seeing the sun from the side

Don’t bother, seems people just aren’t ready to be told they’re being insensitive

I live in a very small town, all 2/3 storey buildings and fields everywhere

Still got buses that run every 10 minutes

Not really talking about preference or individuality here

deleted by creator

“Even if it was effective, I might use it wrongly, or it might secretly be ineffective.”

Listen to yourself.

The text of the original post demonstrably does not contain the phrase you attribute to it. And i have provided evidence of the comment to which I was referring, which is not your own. There is no further proof necessary; and you yourself have even quoted that same post, which even in your attempt, still did not contain the phrase you claim. Only your own comment did.

You have not provided any evidence which supports your claims. Your quotes only prove my point: the OP did not request for this to stop, just stated that they “hate” it.

Further, I even provided reasoning by way of example: my hatred of soap operas and Tesla not motivating a wish for their destruction.

What more do you want? Like I’ve already said, if i misunderstood, then correct me. You have failed to do so.

This really doesn’t need to go as far as it has. You never even needed to reply to me, because you were off topic and not saying anything relevant to my point, which is that their comment was off base.

I’m not sure how the context of the word “astronaut” justifies implying interstellar travel that you aren’t capable of.

Reducing the population won’t lead to fewer deaths. The very act of doing so would itself be death on an untold scale.

No, that’s not my point, that’s just you refusing to see my point. Please, if you’re going to contradict me, provide evidence or sound reasoning. Prove that I misunderstood. I have provided proof for my points. You have neglected that duty.

This wasn’t you. Like I said. You have jumped in and added nothing of value to the conversation.

Yes, I am standing up for OP. I am standing against the “it’s just marketing” idea. The “they should stop” idea was uttered by you, not by OP. You can hate something without demanding for it to stop: I hate soap operas, but don’t demand they stop. I hate Tesla, but don’t demand they should shut down.

If I have misinterpreted OP, then quote where they clearly and unequivocally demanded for it to stop, or where they stated that it was more than just marketing.

There’s no way you actually believe I’m a bot. You’re just running away from the conversation.

Now, look:

THIS is the comment I responded to. Observe how it is entirely unadorned by YOUR username. This is the comment I took issue with. You came after. The actual issue with what you said was that you entirely ignored the point of the OP, and what I said, to support the “it’s just marketing” idea, which belittles OP’s pain.

OP just wanted to vent, not make suggestions for corporations.

False comparison, terrible argument. People also legalise cars and build roads. Try again: why would you prefer fewer people to fewer cars?

Stop saying that!!! I’m not a fucking bot!! I am a human being with thoughts and feelings and autism, and i am far too fucking sick of being called a robot my entire fucking life. I deserve respect and dignity, not to be treated like a defective toaster.

I will not be bullied for standing up for another person. Never. I will not back down just because you tried to throw your weight around and oppress me.

Why do you need to believe that? Can’t you comprehend that I might actually have a point?

Then it should be every ten minutes instead of half hour…

Idk what to tell you, man, but “my local public transport isn’t effective” is an argument against ineffective public transport, not an argument against the general concept