Information should be free. Don’t feel bad because someone abused something good towards a bad end.

The problem here isn’t archives, it’s “AI” and the people behind it.

It’s a phenomenon directly caused by capitalism, what are you even saying?

Capitalism, shortsighted? Say it ain’t so!

Haven’t you heard? That’s communism.

I understand the point you’re trying to make, but it’s not possible to find a middle ground between fact-based reality and outright fiction.

That should be polarizing. We as a society have to stop taking people seriously when they look at the political equivalent of a house on fire and want to debate if the fire is really that bad instead of how we should put it out.

It’s a large enough percentage to reach the White House, and unfortunately that’s all that seems to matter.

Nah nah, that’s not cruel or honest enough. “Why should we save them? They deserve to overdose for being an addict! Has anybody seen my coffee order?”

I don’t think you’re being honest but just in case, let me help you. The implication is, this country has a fascist rot that needs to be excised before it kills us all.

Once the fascist party pretending to be conservative gets out of the way, the conservative party pretending to be liberal can take its place.

Then we might actually have a shot at a true progressive movement in this country.

Fascism is incompatible with democracy.

Spoiler alert.

It won’t be.

What’s your suggestion? We can’t exactly peer into the future and see who will use their education for good or evil. The point of an educated populace is to be able to spot and stop movements like Trump’s before we get into this position in the first place.

Except the EU who did but apparently Trump didn’t know about it until a reporter asked him. Only the best people.

That’s an entirely different conversation, and a strawman to boot. You clearly aren’t interested in actually discussing this. I can show you study after study proving that a bias exists against equally skilled applicants with an “ethnic sounding” name, but why bother, you’re not serious and I’m done engaging with you.

You should really ask yourself why you see raising up one group as necessarily lowering another. One doesn’t follow from the other.

Being able to admit that certain groups are systemically disadvantaged and wanting to do something about it is literally the opposite of racism, what are you talking about?