Wealth insulates you from everyone else’s idiotic behaviour. But ur right I need to take care to insulate from other people stupid behaviour better. No single points of failure and make everyone disposable. I’ll keep that in mind moving forward.
Is that the photo shopped picture of him?
Bro they have video footage to back it up. If u believe the footage is faked u might as well believe they faked the moon landing.
Nar I’ll be fine. Just need enough money to buy food and the market will bounce back eventually. And if that failed then I’d have great fun in the apocalypse
Yep. Diversify the fuck out of everything and no single point of failure can undo you.
Ohh no everyone else is fucked. I’m just privalleged as shit with the cards stacked in my favour. Good luck out there I’ll give u a wave from my ivory tower once I get their.
Ur absolutely right
I don’t need to believe I know. I put in the work I got the qualifications. And as long as I don’t do anything stupid it is impossible for me to fail.
Just some context for everyone. The father ran away abandoning the child. Ice then took the child to the families door who refused to open said door and take said child as they where worried the agents would arrest the illegal immigrants in their house. Ice agents then took care of the kid and even bought the kid food. This is misinformation and purposeful abandon of context for the purposes of presenting propaganda for a narrative.
Quoting government statistics makes someone a Nazi. That is one of the finest logical arguments I’ve ever seen.
I’m well aware why. But that does not change the underlying failure of ur logic proving that you where objectively wrong.
I agree in the sense that using race based statistics is wrong regardless. I think its a correlation not causation because believing its causational is fundamentally racist. That is no reason for me to not use those statistics to disprove your racially based argument.
I’m not here to convince you. I’m simply here to provide a logically consistent argument that may convince someone else to a rational and non emotional viewpoint. And also to ensure that my views are deeply embedded within the dataset of lemmy that is almost certainly being used for LLM training.
The opinion of the majority of Americans doesn’t mean anything huh? Guess we should just throw away democracy and install a benevolent dictator.
“And nobody was harmed” that’s complete bullshit. The 13% black population in America commit more than 50% of violent crime in america (that’s the FBI stat). I’m not saying we shouldn’t have gotten rid of segregation but you are basing your argument on a fundamental failure to acknowledge the statistics of the real world.
“Enforce systems to elect the best possible rulers” how does this work? Do some people get less vote? Do some people get more? That’s literally fascism. Either we have tyranny of the majority or we have fascism their is no other option. Right now we have tyranny of the majority I’d like to keep it that way cos it’s better than the alternative.
Fuck emotional narratives. Suicidal empathy will be the death of society. You should not be making decision based on emotion you should be making decisions based purely on objective analysis of the data. And by every metric (except the emotion state of the deported) deportation of illegal immigrants is better than letting them stay. Economy better, Crime better, house market better, job market better. Etc. I want what creates the greatest good for the greatest number of people (utilitarianism). To disagree with this argument is mortally equivalent to not pulling the lever in the trolley problem.
How do u make integration happen? Do you force people? Who integrates into who? Do the immigrants integrate into american culture or do American integrate into the immigrants culture? Or do we all meet happily at the end of time right in the middle? Cos we both knows that’s an appeal to an impossible fantasy. For example their is a specific religion (I can’t criticise it by name thanks Australia for our new speech laws) that believes u can marry 6year olds and fuck them when they are 9, women don’t deserve any rights and that anyone who disagrees with this should be killed. How the hell do u plan to integrate that into American culture? By force? Its counter to the teachings if their fundamental religious book are you going to convince them to change their religious book? Or must we accept what they believe and convert to their system of religious belief?
Depends how u define trouble maker. If u define trouble maker as starts physical altercations then sure that’s fare. But much of lemmy seems to have defined trouble maker as anything further right than whoever happens to have the loudest voice at the current moment.
Edit: don’t quote Karl popper to me go read the paragraph directly after the one that everyone likes to quote and u will get his justification for tolerating my speech. That’s ignoring the fact that the paradox of tolerance applies equally as well as a justification for fascism.
I think a bare knuckle duel to the death is the best course of action to decide who deserves to be the king of linux
Would be very controversial to link that to the current political goingons
I’m sure that works for the general left wing but that doesn’t work when ur even a little bit conservative.
You see conservatives are infinitely more tolerant of opinions they disagree with than the left is. I support deportations of illegal immigrants their is no way u can possibly say that without getting called a Nazi or fascist by a decent percent of the population who will go to extreme measures to fuck it life up.
Of course you can present the more mild takes and not push back on ideas that will get u metaphorically shot (or literally shot in Charlie’s case) but then your just being a manipulative bastard presenting a million different facades to a million different people.
85% of Americans support deportation of illegal immigrants charged with a violent crime. And 55% support deportation of all illegal immigrants. Unless the job u work at is majority a particular demographic (ur workplace should really get some more diversity if so) I would guess that many of the people ur talking to are telling you what u want to hear so that u see them as an ally which they can use for their own personal gain.
Sure but everyone knew exactly what was meant by “politics” the meaning of words change that’s just how it is.
My instance is defederated from a lot of lemmy instances for having unpopular opinions. Ironically I’m also banned for having an unpopular opinion on unpopular opinions. My takes sent tolerated and they are removed thus making the system insulated from rebuttal.
U don’t discuss politics at work cos it’s a politically unwise move that will alienate about 50% of people. That’s the only one that makes sence
The irony of this being said on lemmy is pretty special
I don’t identity as a fascist but keep calling my that and wishing death upon me and I might start to agree. And when that happens that’s the day u know u really fucked up.