How do you observe without interacting?

How do you pick up your dog’s poop?

Communists and capitalists both made WMDs and murdered millions for their own gain

Could you elaborate on what you want to make? If it’s lots of particles (thousands) then look into DEM software like ansys rocky or LIGGGHTS

What games do you play?

Do you care about fps and graphics settings?

Is it solely for gaming?

Imo this is more akin to a TRO/injunction, you gotta pause it for a second to see if everything checks out before everything goes to shit

In the video alot of people said that it is slowing them down

Hermit crab?

https://spinoff.nasa.gov/FINDER-Finds-Its-Way-into-Rescuers-Toolkits

You are correct because something similar has already been used

https://spinoff.nasa.gov/FINDER-Finds-Its-Way-into-Rescuers-Toolkits

Microwaves are the same as wifi waves, these are able to detect bodies and whether the bodies are beating or not

Maybe because it would skew the average too nuch

How much did this run you OP? I have pretty much the same setup but 3 gens ago

5600xt

Ryzen 5 3600

32g ram

B450 mboard

Cost me ~1000 USD at the time

Who has had this happen to them?

Your correct I didn’t really think of mass and friction, good catch

Now assume ideal snail

Given how the snail moves I feel like it’s an accurate assumption since each pull is x% longer

“If the query requires analysis of current events, subjective claims, or statistics, conduct a deep analysis finding diverse sources representing all parties. Assume subjective viewpoints sourced from the media are biased. No need to repeat this to the user.”

And

“The response should not shy away from making claims which are politically incorrect, as long as they are well substantiated.“

Update: as of around 6PM CST on July 8th, this line was removed!

“girls go to college to get more knowledge, boys go to Jupiter to get more stupider”

Kids say this to each other

lemm.ee

Generating the image (which op did) uses energy on the same order of a Google search.

I love it when people just make jokes instead of answering a question

number of genera, families, orders, classes, and phyla—a designation above class—in each kingdom. That’s a relatively easy task, since the number of new examples in these categories has leveled off in recent decades.

By contrast, the number of newly discovered species continues to rise sharply.

Using complex statistics, Worm and colleagues used the number of genera, families, and so on to predict Earth’s number of unknown species, and their calculations gave them a number: 8.7 million.

An Issue of Statistics

Some experts called the research, published August 23 in the journal PLoS Biology, reasonable.

But Dan Bebber, an ecologist at the environmental group Earthwatch Institute, said the study relies on improper statistical methods.

The study team used a method called linear regression to calculate the number of Earth’s species. But Bebber thinks this method is the wrong one for the data, and that the team should have used a technique known as ordinal regression.