What part of the headline suggests the feature is mandatory? Assuming its mandatory doesn’t pass the critical thinking “sniff test” because what is sensitive is purely subjective. Microsoft has no way of knowing what data you consider sensitive. As in, there’s no way Microsoft could make it mandatory on only “sensitive” data.
You are much more than simply what value other people determine for you. You are your own person with intrinsic value completely separate from the opinions/cares of others. You are doing yourself an injustice if you are dismissing your own value to yourself. No one can take the value you have to yourself away from you, only you can do that. Don’t do that to yourself. Recognize your own value!
There’s another one free with many Public Libraries that has streaming movies and TV called Hoopla. That same service also has ebooks and audiobooks for streaming or download.
This looks like the intentionally slightly misspelled named knockoff movie you see in the DVD dump bin at a Walmart. Its not Transformers, its:
If one product manager gets added to a call, I hear about it from the other PMs. A good day for me is when I have 8 straight hours of coding to do and I don’t speak to a single soul at work.
Unless you’re coding for yourself, you’re not going to escape PMs in any other org you would go to. Your situation is where soft skills come into play. Identify a PM you like, and route all your communication through them. If others want updates, point them to your chosen PM. If others want invites to meetings tell them “no problem, reach out to [favorite PM] to get added”. If Favorite PM doesn’t invite them to the meeting then its an argument between Favorite and the other person and you’re out of the loop.
The best engineers aren’t just good at their technology, but also communicating with others effectively.
I bought a Tesla before Musk was a Nazi. If someone pretends forgets what I drive, I’m quite thankful.
If people thought and referred to it as “that new Prius” that would make me even happier.
With aluminum smelting its not just heat needed like iron/steel smelting, but electricity needed to employ Lorentz forces to separate the aluminum from everything else.
That Canadian and Norwegian aluminum is probably significantly greener than American aluminum too because they have so much hydropower.
“I actually love the concept, but I don’t want it to be used against me politically, because I’ve seen people lose elections for less, especially with the fake news,” he [trump] added at the time.
He’s term limited if he follows the Constitution. Either way his days of worrying about elections are over.
Why is it I have to imagine the AI programmer’s list of topics the AI shouldn’t provide Lego recreations on? That had to be a very dark day when they worked on it and had to verbalize all the horrible things people could come up with that they had to make sure were never to be made into Lego form.
Both mod logs for the bans indicate one of the instance admins saw something I wrote elsewhere and banned me.
Ahh gotcha. They saw your activity on other instances and decided pre-emptively they didn’t want you there on their instances. Well, that’s their right, and I know both aggressively defend their communities.
I’m confused then. How did they ban you if you weren’t in there? If you were never there, how would you even know you were banned?
I’ve been banned from blahaj and beehaw for reasons I don’t agree with
Both those instances have very specific rules that they have established for the protection of their communities. If you go in their clubhouse I think its reasonable to abide by their rules, no matter your opinion on them. If you don’t like the rules for whatever reason, there’s no requirement to go to those instances. There are lots of other instances with are more laissez-faire in their approaches if thats your preferred interactions.
The GOP Climate Change plan of action has been revealed. It is a three pronged plan:
This Guy Bakes
Gal, I think by the user name.
First, you’re awesome for actually volunteering to do this and following through!
They legitimately feel like they have no love they’re just neutrally palatable in flavor and texture in every way.
That sounds like a great description for many AI implementations too!
but I can imagine Republicans and other pouncing on this politically to roll back some environmental legislation.
They’re already doing that anyway today and gas is nowhere near $8/gallon.
Also, in case you’ve forgotten. Jem is truly, truly, outrageous
Hang on. If you’re rejecting rational use cases that companies use Teams for, then your assumption must be that Microsoft will block ALL screen capture when a teams meeting is occurring whether its of the Teams meeting content being shared or not. As in, even the presenter would be blocked from doing screen captures of their own system. Why isn’t that your conclusion?
Why are you, again, from the headline only, assuming that screen capture would mandatory for just content shared to you by a Teams presenter? You chose a middle ground, but why didn’t you choose full blocking?
So are you adapting yours back now because yours was proven wrong?