• 2 Posts
  • 3.27K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 10th, 2023

help-circle







  • Yeah I don’t see this as an issue

    Usiy the word to convey a certain meaning or intent doesn’t mean you condone it, it doesn’t mean I have Hitler posters on the wall.

    Same as master/slave; I don’t have a dungeon filled with human beings that have to do everything I say. I do have a database setup with a master and multiple slaves. I don’t condone slavery btw, one would think that is obvious

    Want more? How about male/female plugs? Need to van those words too now because somehow that is sexist? Am I excluding transgender people for not having a trans plug? Should we rename those to… I do t even know! We call them that because it makes sense, one goes inside the other, and maybe, juuuuust maybe we shouldn’t read too much into it?

    How about killing all my children! Oh shit, I am an insane mass murderer now! Worse? How about forking a child process? Ooooh shiiiiit, now I am a pedophile! Except that, yeah, no, all that too are just words we use to easily explain relationships between processes on computers, and how we duplicate processes or end them, and we use those words because they make intuitive sense. But, I guess that too soon willl be an issue.

    I can’t wait for the kill command to be renamed to “snuggle” or something.




  • Phoenixz@lemmy.catoPolitical Memes@lemmy.worldWomen's rights vary
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    This will also face criticism of normal people, and that kind of is the point.

    If you put up messages like these, then automatically call valid criticism mysogenistic, then you can’t call yourself the good guy/gal anymore

    This is like politicians making some bullshit argument about protecting kids from abuse and anyone trying to give criticism automatically is in the “are you a pedophile, then?” camp.

    If you have an argument to make, make a valid one and keep your auto judgement system off.


  • according to a report that argues global inequality has reached such extremes that ugrgent action ha.cms become essential.

    I guarantee you that that 0.001% agrees, there are too many of them, that should be 0.00001% instead

    Fuck the rich!

    I call for hard limits on personal networth and the worth of companies

    No single person should be able to control more than 10M, companies shouldn’t be worth over 1 billion

    Anything over that, goes to taxes.

    It’s a single basic rule that requires more rules below for sure to ensure it works well, but this should be codified in a world wide constitution.

    This way, nobody gets crazy amounts of money, nobody will have to be poor because the government will have a huge income that it can use for universal healthcare, education, universal basic income, etc…

    Crime would go down the drain because nobody NEEDS to be a criminal anymore. There will still be a few anti social elements but good luck finding people wanting that life if they can just have a good, safe, and happy life.

    Bribery and corruption? How even, and why take the risk?

    There is no logical reason why anyone should have to be allowed to control this much wealth.

    Investment companies must all be dismantled and all their funds transferred to independent non profit organisations that, again, won’t be able to control more than over a billion. Government can transfer money to these foundations so that loads of people can have investments for startups or whatnot

    We’d need similar simple rules for governments too. All governments must be democracies, and all should follow a world constitution where we have a few basic rules that make sure nobody will ever get too much power.

    It doesn’t require a lot of changes at the top. Basically these three rules, all the rest flows out of those rules. We can keep capitalism and use it’s raw power to generate resources for everyone.

    What this needs is political will, this needs people to want this, need this.