That doesn’t seem to be what you were saying in your post?

I woke up 3 and a half hours ago at midnight, and that was after drinking 5 8% ABV beers.

Or it was some random teacher. Or it was more than fifteen years ago. I dunno, it was just what I was taught.

It’ll be awesome to see the improvements Valve makes to ARM compatibility just like they did for Windows compatibility. Would love to see a handheld (by anyone) that utilises AMDs Sound Wave APU to create the king of low-spec, long battery life, indie-gaming.

I didn’t even twig that it was a song honestly, but that makes sense. Thanks for the reply! No harm, no foul.

My comment was entirely meant as a jest because you have a silly username, I’m sorry that it came across as mean.

I was mainly just confused why you called my Caroline, when an actually silly joke like Bloody Norah would have made a lot more sense. Been waiting for someone to use that 🤭

???

Yeah, alright buttnugget.

Yeah, I was taught BOMDAS here in Australia.

Did we not read the same comment? The advisor did have funding for that sort of thing and just plain didn’t offer. Maybe he wanted to have a big pizza party or something ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

You’re already seeing multiple European governments moving to FOSS office suites.

CPUs don’t usually have their own integrated ROM, as far as I can tell the Core Ultra chips don’t. Are you talking about the integrated Neural Processing Unit that those chips have? That’s not hard-coded AI, it’s merely the cores with which to run it on. Which are also more efficient for other Machine Learning tasks that are actually beneficial. The issue there would still be what OS you choose to run on it.

But hey, at least kernel level anti cheating will finally arrive and CS2 will be playable again 🤣

¿Que? Are you suggesting that anti-cheat would be integrated into the microcode? That seems a little absurd. It also would no longer be kernel level but instead some form of hardware level.

“AI” already is built into chips? 🤔

Are you suggesting they’d have like, hard-coded AI or something?

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I was frustrated at someone disagreeing with a person for not liking HP. I think at that point it no longer counts as “separating the art from the artist”.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I don’t consider either of these argumentive.

Maybe it’s because you aren’t considerate.

people are permitted to have differing opinions and likes and dislikes.

Oh, so that’s why you chose to argue with someone about their dislike, right bestie?

Did we culturally forget that digital art and photoshopping exist for a minute?

#real

all of my bags have multiple, my wheelchair has some on the handles, i’ve basically hit hairtie saturation honestly

I mean, my issue was you deciding to comment “harry potter is great” in this thread. There’s a difference between separating the art from the artist, and defending it to folks who don’t like it.