

It exists wherever they say it does surely?
I want to be nice


It exists wherever they say it does surely?


I believe she was in state housing. Classic sovshit shitfuckery.


hopefully those bodies are treating such a questionnaire with the respect it deserves


Then you need to man-up and buy a proper one


Love that basketballs get a specific mention for WA


It’s not meant to benefit young people. If it was they wouldn’t have now explicitly excluded gambling ads from the act. Kids won’t be able to access the fixtures page of their hockey club on Facebook, but can have Bet365 ads rammed down their throats. This act is not about protecting kids. It’s a push to easily, accurately tie everyone’s online presence to their myID.


This is the kicker they don’t seem to understand. Kids just going to sign up to vKontakte or Weibo or Pedro’s stamps collecting forum in Spain. Or any overseas Mastodon etc


Are they somehow suggesting that if Fighty McStealy had been facially-profiled on entering the store that he wouldn’t have done a meth rampage against old mate in a green apron?


I’m getting sick of having to explain to people that “i’Ve gOT noTHIng tO HiDE” is naive bullshit when this comes up


This guy had a good take on it all
The end result is that basically if you want to get a handset you know will work, the average consumer’s only real choice is to buy from the network. At their prices. Funny how things work out.


If I had to choose between this or a phev Ranger, it’s this every time.
There’s a few in Perth. They occasionally paste some laughable text in the local papers proclaiming that they are sole bodies and not beholden to taxation. Or some other bumph. It’s odd that all sovshitness seems to come down to not paying taxes, while still using all the facilities that taxation provides.