Internet is only for people under 25. They are all doing skibidi fortinet cisco dances from TitsTok.

We older people are only doing adult things, like looking outside on Sundays, so you can see if your neighbours are doing something interesting. The other time we are mostly shocked, that they weather has changed. Can you explain, why it was 0°C three days ago at night and now it is near 20°C at 12 o’clock! This is not normal, isn’t? And the weather is also at fault if something hurts. Also the neighboard looked 10% less friendly yesterday, we will talk with our partner for 5 hours about that.

At evening we engage in solving crosswords, while listening to muzak.

A Planck second after you turn 25, you will be the same es the rest of us. Enjoy your youth, it will be over soon. Less internet over 25

I definitely saw it once on YouTube. They had an official YouTube channel

China is a big market. Just look how many people live there and they have also enough money to afford stuff. So what does a smart bourgeois do if such a great option appears to accumulate more capital? Right, capital export is a big thing. Look how Volkswagen is struggling since they are selling less cars in China. On the other hand they actually do not want to import stuff from China if its competing with local products. This is normal for capitalism and very important if you look into imperialism.

However, China has a different framework and so you can’t just ship something and sell there. You need to form joint ventures or then comply to stuff here and there and and and. It works different. It is not seen favourable especially for the west, that China is able not only to protect its industry this way, but also to benefit from it.

Would Kirghizia implement something like that, it wouldn’t have much impact to simply “skip” this country and alao don’t sell Vuvuzella-10BillionDead-IPhones at all there. But China is freaking gigantic with its market. Meaning, western companies accept to comply to a lot, because they still have a high surplus.

As long as capitalists can make money, they will even sell you the rope with which they will be hanged. Or in this case its a big benefit for China if the create joint ventures with Chinese companies, despite it is the 90Billions-Uighurs-WinniePo-PianoMan-Country.

Having biological children is probably inherently selfish, but that doesn’t make having children an inherently bad or evil thing. That’s my entire point.

Who cares if it is selfish or not, why does it matter at all? In the end it has still nothing to do with Anti-Natalism. The name itself is nomen est omen and says everything needed to know. Your point is not anti-natalism but a mere moral observation, why life is creating more life. You can be easily misunderstood if you confuse this terms

Like, if we had technology for genetic manipulation, and someone who dosen’t exists so it’s can’t concent to be birth without eyes, arms and legs, so it would be OK to do it?

In the actual world, dominated by the bourgeoisie, there is some consent between people and scientiest, that this would be not ok. It is not been seen as ethical. What is ethical or not is nothing more than a artificial line made by humans and depends greatly on material conditions. Especially after human experiments in Japan and Germany.

But the question, if it is ok to artificially create a human with so many disabilities or simply give birth to human, are things which are not related at all. Only if you really equal the human existence itself as a form of suffering, then it has nothing to do with marxism at all and is some Buddha or similar idealistic stuff. But even they are not against giving birth to children.

Maybe the problem is more about branding, if I would say exactly the same without saying the word “antinatalist” nobody would bat an eye.

This are different things. Anti-natalism has nothing to do with being against artificially creating people with the aim of making them suffer as much as possible.

Caring for it also means additional work. People have jobs, so there is not always time. Also if I remember right there are some weird laws regarding having a garden in the USA, so you actually don’t have the freedom to do everything you want with it.

The Soviet Union had datschas and the were great. I have great memories about the datscha of my grandparents. There was a vast amount of cucumbers, tomatoes, strawberries and and and. The taste was something to remember for eternity. But it took so much work time to care for this all. In the 90s having a datscha was a good key to survive those times. But you had still your work to do every day and sometimes after work or on the weekends you worked on the datscha.

Even if you have your petite bourgeoisie middle-class household in the USA with a garden, it still takes a lot of time. And you also need knowledge. Additionally you also have normal workers which saved enough money for a credit to buy a house and they have to work their ass off to pay it all off.

The question is simple, why don’t they “just” do it? But the more you think about it, the more reasons you find, why the answer is a longer one.

Also I would rather save money and advise to leave this country, buy a house somewhere else and then plant there your trees and bushes. Even in some Siberian city with a low population you will get at least treated for free if you are sick and don’t have to think about planting something eadible, because you are now indebted for 20 generations for having an illness.

Parties can be small and then become quite big and a majority. The Bolsheviks were a minority, don’t forget it. It works also the other way around, look how the SED disappeared.