Some of the cameras are fake.

I’ll most likely live long enough to see the $100,000 a year surpass the $2,000,000, so that.

I neither have a phone nor drive.

Voting for the guy you said you wouldn’t vote for.

Same.

Turns out it was never a recurring thing.

I actually didn’t know anything was going on.

We’re all here for you every step of the way.

In a dedicated (or “extreme”) demonstration of how the phenomenon people today often call “sealioning” is really just a part of the way things must go at times, where I live, the only surefire way to unquestionably be considered dead by authorities is with a body to organically examine. Even if you did what Metro Man did in Mega Mind, it wouldn’t typically be followed by a declared conclusion because they have a knack for genetic/bodily testing and making sure no assembly of working organs was able to wander off somewhere. Every status either authorities or laypeople can imbue in you that doesn’t follow this mindset will grant you a “probably dead” at best while your living record remains in the back of peoples’ minds and filing cabinets.

The absolutely only exception that doesn’t merely involve this is to go missing at a certain age, stay missing until you’re well over 100, and hope you’ve actually lived well over 100 so that it counts as “faking” your death (since it’s not faking death if you really did die), and though I could try, I would bet my life on the fact I won’t live over 100 (which will probably end up being one reason why).

From the perspective of the interviewer or the one being interviewed?

I don’t have a phone.

They accept a lack of evidence as natural in vetting someone for their supposed wrongfulness.

Crispy enough to give it a texture, soft enough to soak in eggs or syrup.

Kiwi culture. It isn’t defined as much by its tug of war on other cultures as other cultures are.

Did you eat it that way too?

I’d grow a quince tree if I could.

As opposed to ever?

Do you not think I know what you’re getting at?

Maybe the rule enforcer in that instance was a time lord.

I had to fit through a tiny hole to exit a submarine I had already been stranded in for nine months.

That moment when I ask a question that gives rule enforcers the benefit of the doubt thinking they might not be singling me out with how they treat me before they give dishonest reasoning, and someone with absolutely no previous interactive history answers my question implying how the rule enforcers have treated me really is the oddest thing in the archives. Glad to know other people see through their inconsistency.