I keep hitting my face on the fact that DKMS modules somehow don’t depend on the kernel headers and these have to be installed manually. This happened to me both in Arch and in Debian.
Why does everyone seem to think that this makes sense?
I keep hitting my face on the fact that DKMS modules somehow don’t depend on the kernel headers and these have to be installed manually. This happened to me both in Arch and in Debian.
Why does everyone seem to think that this makes sense?


They are all either visa or MasterCard, which end up taking a cut. On top of that there is the whole massive problem of these two companies being gatekeepers and deciding what can or can’t be traded in the world, whether it is legal or not.


More like using Brave (besides the questionable leadership, of course)
Bombtrack, obviously.
It’s still leagues ahead of LLMs. I’m not saying it’s entirely impossible to build a computer that surpasses the human brain in actual thinking. But LLMs ain’t it.
The feature set of the human brain is different, in a way that you can’t compensate for by just increasing scale. So you get something that works but not quite, by using several orders of magnitude more power.
We optimize and learn constantly. We have chunking, whereby a complex idea becomes simpler for our brain once it’s been processed a few times, and this allows us to progressively work on more and more complex ideas without an increase in our working memory. And a lot of other stuff.
If you spend enough time using LLMs you must notice how their working is different from your own.
Plenty of people have. Seems like she does a bit of escorting as well? Could make for a nice birthday gift.
It basically mostly already exists, but it’s in Java:


Damn that’s cool.


Of course I knew about CD Projekt Red and Paradox. Somehow the titles I mentioned caught me by surprise.
About France, you could have named Arkane. They did Dishonored which was really really good.
Only Italy does not seem to have a gaming industry to speak of.
On mobile, why would I play Angy Birds when I can play Dead Cells (free right now in the Epic Store for Android, though it’s well worth paying for)? Though I have to admit I’m kinda addicted to the open source goodness of Shattered Pixel Dungeon and Mindustry. Likely not made in Europe, but so good, and you can get then straight from F-Droid.
Been there, done that.
I bought a new 4K screen for my home office, to use with my work ThinkPad T480.
Actually had to switch from Konsole to Kitty because my old-ass laptop had scroll lags on the big screen when moving around in neovim.
Edit: It was neovim, I’m not living in 2005.


And the devs of Helldivers II are apparently Swedish? Yesterday I suddenly found out that Dead Cells is actually French.
The European gaming industry seems, from an outsider, to be doing some good work.


Penalties for homicide in Italy, are generally still harsh enough that increasing them won’t realistically make a difference.
But this kind of murder is most often an escalation, and so the chance for prevention exists. But that sounds hard, increasing the penalty for the murder to life +5 yeas is easy.


It’s a bit worse than that though.
The law in Italy literally defines homicide as the killing of a man. God knows how long it’s been on the books with that wording.
Of course that hasn’t stopped anyone from being prosecuted for that crime even with that wording, and that use is clearly understood to be synonymous with human, the same way that noone thinks that the word mankind excludes women. No lawyer, judge of citizen has any doubt with regards to that.
Nevertheless, in this day and age that wording does feels dated, even to me.


Downvotes and doesn’t answer to the point.
Class.


Do the rates matter? Does covering everyone cost extra?
Law shouldn’t discriminate for sex or gender or race or a bunch of other things (yes there can be rare exceptions where the biological sex does matter, e.g. abortion, but can we read a whole paragraph without whaboutism?)
People go through a ton of effort to explain how it’s perfectly possible (and common) to write laws with sexist results even using neutral language.
And yet when we need to do the reverse, write laws that are meant to combat discrimination and and inequality without having to spell out and pick each specific group it’s meant to protect the same people go “nope, sorry, can’t be done”.
Edit: Think of the so-called “pink quotas” argument. Does it make a difference to write that you need at least 30% women, or to write that you need at least 30% of each sex? Practical results is exactly. the same, but one of the two is written neutrally, and I think there is value in that. Don’t you?


Beccaria is spinning in his grave.


Idiot implies it’s a human
Except when the error is in the chip architecture.


Yeah, not really. First example I can think of:
Are you 100% sure about that?
We are specifically talking about Credit cards, not bank cards.
Further, I think EC is a German only payment system, so it won’t get you terribly far.