

Same, only I deactivate the corresponding clue as “used up” right away.
The system is less effective when it’s “1 out of 3” (although still helpful) and doesn’t work with two conditions on the same tile.


Same, only I deactivate the corresponding clue as “used up” right away.
The system is less effective when it’s “1 out of 3” (although still helpful) and doesn’t work with two conditions on the same tile.


Curious. There are certain ones it doesn’t work on, both on desktop and mobile, but works as normal other than that. Maybe check your settings?


Consent-o-matic does too support Firefox mobile! What makes you think it doesn’t?


Try .vcf Verify the content by opening it with a text editor. Compare with the individual file that already worked for you.


Your point being that I am not currently using it? Or that I should be looking for alternatives since I am currently using it?


Thanks for the detailed explanation. Will try to see how it fits my setup when I get a chance, but I have been wanting to move away from Watchtower as it is no longer maintained. Good to know there is an alternative, and from what you describe I like your approach. Having to opt-out of updates in Watchtower never really sat right with me- Watchtower clutter is okay in compose files that actually want something to do with Watchtower…


Is this a replacement for Watchtower?
That, or the watchmakers of old didn’t have to worry about wiring actuators, speakers, and heart rate monitors on the back plate. Or is that against nature and shouldn’t be done in the first place anyway?
For what it’s worth, my F91W has Philips screws on the back plate exactly like this and I never had a problem, and I’ve taken it apart more than a few times (it’s a Sensor Watch!)
I wonder if it will be less annoying with a point cloud. You’ll still need to model it, only with a digital reference, correct?
Airtable or nocodb might be suitable for this. Or Nextcloud Forms. But hard to advise since it’s not clear if your focus is on data entry or visualization.


I’m low key on the lookout for something like this as well, to gain independence from mail providers, and I’ve had a browser tab for Mail Archiver open for a few months now but never got around to trying it out. Maybe this would solve your problem?


This looks friendly. I gave up setting up Authelia after my last attempt, but I might give it another go with this when motivation hits me. Some documentation for Traefik integration would be nice.
Good tires and adequate pressure and I haven’t had a single puncture in years. But I get your sentiment, and of course it’s not for everybody. Although for me, the number one best way to get away from cars is gravel and single trails. So that, and being in the woods, are the main reasons for my love of gravel riding.
Where I’m from, the Eurovelos actually live up to their grand concept and are fully developed and paved as far as I’ve seen (and therefore a bit boring for me), but I don’t have to go far (a day’s ride across a border) and our “pan-european cycle path” is actually “the perfectly good street we happened to have lying around here; have fun!”
I agree with your take on Osmand; a problem many big FOSS projects seem to share. I’m almost certain that there must be a way to properly penalise unpaved roads for routing with brouter, by the way. I’d check it out for you, but I truly dread the settings menus of those two apps…
My main motivation for trying out brouter was to prepare for the Komoot exodus when it will inevitably happen, and I have a different experience to yours. I find the routing to be on par with Komoot (often nearly identical routes, actually), and that’s been the best I’ve seen for my purposes so far. My main priority is to avoid roads for my gravel tours as much as possible (the larger the more urgently) with trail and woods segments actually being a plus and direct path not being important at all.
That said, I do hate the user experience with brouter+Osmand. I have no clue why brouter has to be a separate app. I have no clue how to properly configure it, and I am completely overwhelmed with Osmand’s millions of options, views, and settings. Software that makes me feel dumb and inadequate.
There’s also brouter which acts as a routing companion app to Osmand. It’s a bit of a pain to set up, but gives very good results.


I wasn’t advocating to get a J4125 in 2025, I was sharing my experience with it. I can’t confirm it choking with Jellyfin.


I’m doing everything you list and quite a bit more on a QNAP with a Celeron J4125. A fraction of the cpu performance you’ll have, yet very capable of all the tasks I ask of it. 16gb of memory is a good starting point I think.
What does your build come out at?


“Just” some highly specific VM settings, in the end. I don’t know much about that, and terms like qemu don’t mean anything to me so I followed blog posts until it worked. (This one and maybe this one, I think.) It’s possible that it is actually trivial.
It’s been a while, but I can look up what I have when you need it. Feel free to ping me!
Yes, it was exactly that: Once I got the NICs set up the way I wanted them it was a breeze and everything just works. And I really like that I made every part work myself, no magic. I learned a lot, and wouldn’t have had I relied on Proxmox fiddling with the right parts for me.


I was in a similar spot not too long ago, setting up a firewall and general network box. I was going to go with Proxmox but a fellow Lemmy guy strongly advocated for Incus on top of vanilla Debian. I was intrigued and ended up going for it. Learned a lot about networking with systemd (bridging, IP assignment and so on) for things I could have gotten for free in Proxmox (literally a few clicks), and had to fight Incus to work with a FreeBSD VM for Opnsense, but I love the setup now. Pure debian with a few Incus VMs and Docker inside of those as needed. So clean!
I didn’t realise that’s there! Will see if it helps me solve those hard ones faster from now on.