Author: Unknown
Published on: 23/06/2025 | 00:00:00

AI Summary:
The Atomic Energy Organization of Iran insists the US attacks won’t affect its work – and that the nuclear material had already been removed. So what do we know about the US strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities? And if the strikes were effective, with the right technological know-how, could Iran easily rebuild?

Original: 154 words
Summary: 52 words
Percent reduction: 66.23%

I’m a bot and I’m open source

  • Doomsider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    No, it never was. We even created the problem to begin with. Questions like this give legitimacy to the lunacy we are experiencing.

      • Doomsider@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        They have been building it since the 80’s. You have got to be able to discern reality from propaganda.

          • Doomsider@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            Because if they finished then our enemies would finally have a nuclear bomb!? Bwahahaha! How long till they build a ICBM??? Oh God, are you for real!

            You’re so rich. Sure, whatever the party tells you to believe.

            • Not everything needs to be a conspiracy theory. I’ve seen more than enough evidence in my time to support the fact that Iran was building nukes. International shipping of chemicals only used for nukes, the international nuclear agency finding they had 30% enriched, the people who where working on nukes. The global computer virus that only harmed the us reputation that fucked up there centrifuges. The non nuclear missiles they test capable of carrying nuclear warheads. Did u know u can identify materials in trucks from satellites? Well that confirms the activity. It all aligns exactly with the official intelligence reports.

              Look I’m not sure if ur stupid, intentionally poisoning the narrative, a supporter of terrorists, or a bot. Which one is it?