If a major city has to beg for one million dollars to save lives, then there’s a major problem going on here.

The same city would have no problem spending tens of millions on road widening or some other car-centric bullshit “improvement”.

Some of the road project costs I see for my municipality would easily cover the next 15 years of active transportation infrastructure. Yet, we throw it away to single, useless projects designed only for the convenience of motorists.

Yes, Trump has said publicly several times that he would not have won if the elections weren’t rigged.

That said, he didn’t fabricate tens of millions of votes.

Thank god the owners are Canadian. This is an iconic brand, so I’m glad they are staying alive!

Fun fact, I found one of their cycling jerseys at a second hand store a few years back. It was one of their milestone jerseys (i.e. 15th anniversary)… “built in Canada” on the label, dated 1996. I still wear it!

Yeah, I think they could have made it clear in the article. “Mexican woman” seems so strange if they are talking about an American citizen.

And yet, I think most people are checking all those boxes, unfortunately. Pray for their mental health! 😵

But why even jump to that conclusion? They could have said “may cause baldness”, too.

I mean, they come up a list of things, but proved none of it: “Chemicals in everyday plastics may disrupt the body’s natural 24-hour sleep-wake cycle and circadian rhythm in a way similar to coffee, which increases the risk of sleep disorders, diabetes, immune problems and cancer, new in vitro research shows.”

I just wish that journalists would be a little less sensationalist with stuff like this. Even if it were an animal-based study, assumptions should be tempered when it comes to reporting on the implications to human health.

Not to criticize the study, since we really do need to know how these plastics are harming us, but the headlines need to chill out.

Yes, it will lead to other studies, but the headline suggests that “Plastics in everyday objects may disrupt sleep in same way as caffeine…” as if they actually compared plastic exposure to caffeine in living people through a sleep study.

Seems like a huge assumption.

I say this, because in vitro studies can point to very wrong, absurdly misleading conclusions. For example, avocado extract appears to damage human chromosomes… in vitro. But when consumed, it’s healthy, and may even be cancer-protective.

new in vitro research shows.

So, they didn’t actually study people’s sleep?

Any priest who complies with a new law requiring the reporting of child abuse confessions to authorities will be excommunicated.

Oh, are we going to play that game?

Why does the Catholic Church have to be so fucking evil?

A Mexican woman living in the United States… voted for Trump

Can someone explain this? Is she an American citizen who was born in Mexico? Or a Mexican citizen, living in the States, who found a way to vote in the American elections?

And there’s no chance of ever getting pre-Trump America back. You guys voted for this. Twice.

Actions have consequences, and you’re in the “found out” phase.

In North America, that most certainly means you’ll be going 45 to keep up with everyone else. 😂

I am not sure on the other ones but Decathlon is 100% made in PRC.

I can’t say for sure 100% with my bike unless I check the label, but I see other bikes in the same series, with one being “Country of Origin: France” and the other “Country of Origin: Portugal”.

They are Decathlon’s own brand of bike, not just the store they were purchased at. 😀

Longer range so it can get stuck further from home? 🤭😀👍

Top comment by [Noah Mayer]

Liked by 5 people

Can’t acoustic bikes also reach 20-30 mph? I know it’s easier to reach those speeds on an ebike, but is it truly not an issue with regular bikes? To me, it just seems to unfairly target ebikes when regular bikes can also reach high speeds.

Unless someone is flat out sprinting, those speeds on a regular bike would not be easy achieve by a regular person in a crowded park.

That said, this is going to be a case of “a few will spoil it for the many”.

Without electric options, the city would be hurting accessibility, so that would be bad.

Sigh. I don’t know. Fine people being dangerous? Publicly shame them for riding like an asshole? I would try anything before removing micromobility from a public space.

Cause and effect. This is why many of us want to see alternatives to cars in our cities - because it makes life better for everyone, including drivers!

We’ll see what Zero Friction Cycling has to say after it’s been tested.

Looks like a wax product (good), but can it actually penetrate into where the pins in the chain are? And does it repel dirt as well as immersion wax?

Is he reopening Jurassic Park? 🤭

I’ll respectfully disagree, because there are plenty of studies that show a wide gap in understanding of road signs, with some being considerably more intuitive to understand than others.

As an example, have a look at the data below:

As you can see, the “no powered vehicle” sign (red line through it) was understood by nearly everyone, with no confusion.

Compare that to the “no cycling”, “no pedestrian” or “no motor vehicle” signs below:

You have mass confusion, with very few people actually knowing what the sign means before they are trained. To me, that’s a design flaw.

Other studies show a similar pattern.

This one for example, asked people from different countries to identify the meaning of various traffic signs.

I will point out that the ones which scored nearly perfectly identified, are the ones with a line through them; Signs with just coloured circles were very often misidentified, or understood as having the opposite meaning.

We can go back and forth on this (I don’t want to), and while I do agree that education can reduce the chance of a sign being misunderstood, that misses the point completely.

Can’t do a bad job if you don’t even know what the job is! /s